Self-Adjusting Slide Gate Seal System Reducing Friction and Leaks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional slide gate seals face issues such as high frictional drag, debris collection, complex installation and maintenance, and leak paths due to multiple parts and adjustment requirements, leading to increased operational forces and reduced seal life.

Innovation Solution

A self-adjusting, one-piece seal system for slide gates that includes a top seal with a shield member to prevent debris and reduce friction, a one-piece side seal with reduced leak paths, and a bottom seal with fixation members to maintain position, eliminating manual adjustments and enhancing sealing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If conventional top seals use a rectangular shape with wide sides to provide sealing surface area, then sealing coverage is improved, but frictional drag increases and debris collection occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing surface areaVSAvoidfrictional drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The top seal is divided into a sealing member and a shield member. The sealing member provides the sealing surface area against the gate face, while the shield member with narrower sides prevents debris collection and reduces frictional drag during gate operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shield member acts as an intermediary between the sealing member and the debris-laden flow. It protects the sealing member from direct contact with debris while maintaining the sealing function, thereby reducing wear and friction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional side seals comprise multiple parts that can be adjusted, then adaptability to gate face variations is improved, but device complexity and installation maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability to gate faceVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The side seal is formed as a single monolithic piece combining the sealing function and structural support. This eliminates the need for multiple adjustable parts while maintaining adaptability through the seal's inherent flexibility and self-conforming capability to the gate face.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The one-piece side seal automatically conforms to the gate face geometry without requiring manual adjustment of multiple parts. The seal's material properties and design enable it to self-adjust to variations in the gate surface, eliminating complex adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional bottom seals are bonded to the bottom channel, then installation simplicity is improved, but reliability decreases over time due to bonding agent degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidseal position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom seal assembly is segmented into the bottom seal, fixation members, and bonding agent components. The fixation members provide mechanical anchoring that supplements the bonding agent, ensuring long-term reliability while maintaining simple installation through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bottom seal system uses a composite approach combining chemical bonding (bonding agent) with mechanical fixation (fixation members). This dual-mechanism approach enhances reliability over time by providing redundant retention methods that resist degradation from chemical agents and compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If conventional seals require forcible urging to press against the gate face, then sealing tightness is improved, but operational force requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing tightnessVSAvoidoperational force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing members are designed with dynamic characteristics that allow them to flex and conform to the gate face during operation. This dynamic adaptation enables effective sealing without requiring excessive forcing, as the seals naturally adjust to maintain contact under varying operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The seal design incorporates material and geometric parameters that optimize the balance between sealing force and operational force. By adjusting seal material properties, cross-sectional dimensions, and mounting configurations, the system achieves tight sealing with minimal additional forcing beyond normal operational forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8820711B2Seal system
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 WATERMAN IND LLC A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY
  • US8820711B2 patent drawing
  • US8820711B2 patent drawing
  • US8820711B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A slide gate having a frame assembly including an intermediate cross member coupled between a first and second gate guide members defining a corresponding pair of side channel elements each containing an elongate side seal which abut opposed ends of an elongate top seal secured to the intermediate cross member to seal a gate slidely engaged in the pair of side channel elements.