Sliding closure for cabinets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sliding closure systems for cabinets, particularly in emergency vehicles, face challenges in easy panel removal and replacement, especially when panels become scratched or damaged, and lack adequate durability to withstand impacts.

Innovation Solution

A frame assembly with sliding panels that includes interlocking stiffeners for enhanced durability and a panel support system with spring-loaded members for easy engagement and disengagement, allowing panels to be lifted and tilted for removal, and a securing member to prevent separation during impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If panels are securely fixed in the frame to prevent separation during impacts, then durability and reliability are improved, but ease of removal and replacement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel security during impactsVSAvoidpanel removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The panel support system is divided into separate components: panel supports with holding members that engage the panel edges, and a frame with channels. This segmentation allows the panel to be securely held during operation but easily removed when needed, resolving the contradiction between security and ease of removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The holding members are designed to dynamically engage and disengage from the panel edges. During normal operation, the holding members securely retain the panels to prevent impact separation. When removal is needed, the holding members can be easily actuated to release the panels, providing both security and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If panels are easily removable for replacement when scratched or damaged, then ease of operation is improved, but durability and security during impacts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel removal easeVSAvoidpanel security during impacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The panel supports and holding members are pre-installed in the frame channels, ready to securely engage the panels before any impact occurs. This preliminary setup ensures that when panels are installed, they are immediately secured against impact forces, while still maintaining ease of removal through the designed disengagement mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the frame structure is simplified to reduce complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but ability to provide secure panel retention and impact resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe structure complexityVSAvoidpanel retention security
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure with channels and panel supports serves multiple functions: it provides structural support for the cabinet, secures panels during impacts through the holding members, and enables easy panel removal and replacement. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate complex systems, achieving both simplicity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The panel supports act as intermediary components between the frame and the panels. These intermediaries provide the secure retention mechanism during impacts while maintaining ease of removal, allowing the frame structure itself to remain relatively simple without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If holding members are designed for easy disengagement to facilitate panel removal, then ease of operation is improved, but structural strength and impact resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel removal easeVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The holding members are designed with dynamic engagement characteristics: they provide strong retention forces during normal operation and impacts, but can be easily disengaged when needed. This dynamic behavior resolves the contradiction between ease of removal and impact resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The holding members utilize spring-loaded or biasing mechanisms that change their engagement parameters. Under normal conditions, they maintain strong engagement for impact resistance. During removal operations, the biasing force enables easy disengagement, achieving both ease of operation and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables easy and secure removal of panels, enhances durability by preventing panel separation during impacts, and maintains the cabinet's structural integrity, making it suitable for emergency vehicle storage.

Implementation Method 1

The panel support includes a spring-loaded member that engages to the panel and biases the panel into the channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A frame assembly with sliding panels that includes interlocking stiffeners for enhanced durability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 3

a securing member to prevent separation during impacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS11834878B2Sliding closure for cabinets
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 AUSTIN HARDWARE & SUPPLY INC
  • US11834878B2 patent drawing
  • US11834878B2 patent drawing
  • US11834878B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A frame assembly with sliding panels is described. The frame assembly includes a frame having an upper section opposite of a lower section. The lower section of the frame defines a first channel and a second channel. A first sliding panel includes a first lower edge. A first panel support is removably engaged to the first lower edge. The first panel support includes a first holding member that engages to the first lower edge. The first panel support slides in the first channel. A second sliding panel includes a second lower edge. A second panel support is removably engaged to the second lower edge. The second panel support includes a second holding member that engages to the second lower edge. The second panel support slides in the second channel.