Sliding Closure Maintenance via Automated Manual Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for maintaining sliding closures at metallurgical vessels, particularly in harsh steelworks environments like the ladle area, lack flexibility to adapt between automated and manual operations efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A method that allows for seamless transition between automated and manual maintenance of sliding closures by using a robot to selectively release the drive and enable unfolding, with automatically lockable or releasable cassettes and closure plates that can be manually inserted or removed, utilizing elbow lever mechanisms and snap-in elements for secure attachment and detachment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated maintenance with robot is used, then productivity and precision are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The maintenance system is designed to be dynamically switchable between automated robot operation and manual operation modes. The robot can be selectively activated or deactivated based on maintenance requirements, allowing the system to adapt its level of automation rather than being fixed, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The maintenance installation is designed to perform multiple functions through a single system that can operate in both automated and manual modes. The same basic structure supports both robot-based maintenance operations and manual operations, eliminating the need for separate systems and reducing overall complexity while maintaining productivity benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If automated maintenance is implemented, then maintenance precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance precisionVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows dynamic switching between automated and manual operation modes based on the specific maintenance task and operator preference. This flexibility ensures that high precision tasks can use automated robot operation while simpler tasks can be performed manually, maintaining ease of operation across different scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A control system acts as an intermediary between the robot and manual operations, providing a unified interface for selecting and switching between operation modes. This intermediary layer simplifies the operational complexity by presenting users with straightforward mode selection without exposing the underlying system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If robot is used for maintenance, then productivity is improved, but adaptability to different conditions worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance throughputVSAvoidflexibility to conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The maintenance system incorporates dynamic adaptability by allowing real-time switching between automated and manual modes based on actual maintenance conditions. When conditions change or require human judgment, the system can adapt by engaging manual operation, thus maintaining both productivity and versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes its operational parameters by switching between automated and manual modes based on maintenance requirements. This parameter change allows the system to optimize for productivity during routine tasks while adapting to complex or variable conditions through manual intervention, resolving the contradiction between throughput and flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240342789A1Method for maintenance of a sliding closure at the outlet of a metallurgical vessel
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 REFRACTORY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH & CO KG
  • US20240342789A1 patent drawing
  • US20240342789A1 patent drawing
  • US20240342789A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for servicing or maintenance of a sliding closure on an outlet of a metallurgical vessel includes controlling, using a robot for automated maintenance, a drive on the sliding closure to selectively enable release of the sliding closure or drive, and enable unfolding of the sliding closure. When the sliding closure is unfolded, a first refractory closure plate is, together with a first cassette, insertable into or removable from a housing of the sliding closure and a second refractory closure plate is, together with a second cassette, insertable into or removable from a slider unit coupled to the housing. In an available manual maintenance stage at the same location, the cassettes are fixed in the housing and slider unit and the closure plates are insertable manually directly into the respective cassette to be centered and fastened therein, or the closure plates are releasable from the respective cassette.