Sliding Door Braking Control for Emergency Exit Pinch Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In autonomous vehicles with sliding doors, power failures can create a pinch point where passengers' hands or arms may get stuck while trying to open the door, posing a safety risk during emergency exits.

Innovation Solution

An emergency door braking system that includes a vehicle processor for storing data on door latch status and sliding door location, and a server configured to stop the sliding door at a predetermined location based on this data, thereby preventing injury to passengers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an emergency opening lever is provided for power failure situations, then passenger safety during power failure is improved, but a pinch point is created where hands or arms may get stuck

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safety during power failureVSAvoidpinch point injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by detecting door latch status and predicting potential pinch points before the door moves. The server calculates the door trajectory and identifies hazardous zones in advance, then applies braking force to prevent the door from entering positions that would cause injury to passengers operating the emergency lever.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring door latch status, door position, and passenger presence. The server receives real-time data about the door's operational state and adjusts the braking control dynamically based on this feedback, ensuring the door stops at safe positions while still allowing emergency access when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the sliding door is controlled by a vehicle server, then door operation precision is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor position control precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by making the existing vehicle server perform multiple functions: it controls normal door operation, monitors door latch status, calculates door trajectories, identifies pinch points, and controls emergency braking. This consolidates multiple control functions into a single existing controller, avoiding the need for separate dedicated controllers while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by having the vehicle server use its own existing resources and data structures to perform the additional safety functions. The server leverages its existing communication infrastructure, processing capabilities, and integration with the vehicle's Hall effect sensor system to implement pinch point detection and braking control without requiring external dedicated hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250122754A1Emergency door braking system
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US20250122754A1 patent drawing
  • US20250122754A1 patent drawing
  • US20250122754A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An emergency door braking system for an autonomous vehicle includes a vehicle processor for storing vehicle data including door latch status and vehicle sliding door location. The emergency door braking system also includes a server communicatively coupled to the vehicle processor and configured to stop a sliding vehicle door at a predetermined vehicle sliding door location based on the door latch status.