Sliding Door Spacer for Collision Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sliding door arrangements suffer from unsightly collision protection devices that are visible and ineffective in preventing collisions between sliding leaves, leading to potential damage and an unappealing aesthetic.

Innovation Solution

A sliding door arrangement featuring a captive spacer within the support or guide rail that sets the minimum distance between leaves, combined with a coupling device and optional damping, ensuring collision prevention and a visually concealed design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If plastic or rubber buffers are used to mitigate collision impact, then collision protection is improved, but rebound of panels occurs and visual appearance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision protectionVSAvoidvisual appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The collision protection function is extracted from the sliding panels themselves and placed into a separate stop element positioned in the rail. This removes the visible buffers from the panel surfaces while maintaining collision protection through the hidden stop element that engages when panels approach each other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A stop element acts as an intermediary component between the sliding panels, positioned in the rail to prevent direct collision. This mediator absorbs the collision protection function while remaining invisible from the front, eliminating both rebound issues and visual disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If cover strips or end-edge contours are used to conceal collision protection devices, then visual appearance is improved, but collision protection effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual appearanceVSAvoidcollision protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The collision protection function is completely extracted from the visible panel surfaces and relocated to the rail system. The stop element resides within the rail structure, making no visual impact on the sliding panels while providing effective collision prevention through its positioning and engagement mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If spacers are provided between sliding doors to prevent hard collision, then collision protection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision protectionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stop element is merged with the existing rail structure, utilizing the rail's space and support. This integration avoids adding separate complex mechanisms between panels, as the stop element simply resides in the rail and engages naturally when panels approach, maintaining simplicity while providing reliable collision protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3094803B1Sliding door arrangement having sliding leaves arranged in a common plane
Publication Date: 2019.10.09 HETTICH HEINZE GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3094803B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3094803B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3094803B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A sliding door arrangement having sliding leaves (1, 2) which are arranged in a common plane and in common support and guide rails (5, 7), at least one collision protection device (8, 8') being provided between the mutually opposite front edges of the adjacent sliding leaves (1, 2), is designed such that the at least one collision protection device (8, 8') comprises a spacer element (9, 15) which is arranged inside the support and/or guide rail (5, 7) and is located in the sliding region of the sliding leaves (1, 2).