Sliding Door Guide System Load Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sliding door systems face high assembly costs and instability during the closing process and in the closed state, leading to a shorter service life and potential safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A sliding door system with a compact unit featuring a frame of detachably connected profile rods, where the weight and tilting moments are distributed between two identical C/U/V/L-shaped guide profiles mounted on guide rods via heavy-duty recirculating ball or roller bearings, allowing for modular assembly and reduced on-site installation complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single guide system is used to support the door leaf, then the device complexity is reduced, but the stability during closing and in closed state deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguide system complexityVSAvoiddoor leaf stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The single guide system is segmented into two separate linear guide systems (first linear guide and second linear guide) that are spaced apart from each other. Each guide independently supports the door leaf, distributing the load and improving stability during closing and in the closed state without significantly increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the door leaf is mounted laterally to the guide system, then the ease of operation is improved, but the tilting moment absorption capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor leaf operationVSAvoidtilting moment absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The tilting moment absorption is segmented and distributed between two linear guides spaced apart from each other. Each guide absorbs a portion of the tilting moment, allowing the door leaf to be mounted laterally for easy operation while maintaining sufficient strength to absorb tilting moments without requiring additional counter bearings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If assembly is performed at the installation site, then the adaptability to different locations is improved, but the assembly work requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation location adaptabilityVSAvoidassembly work requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The guide system is divided into modular linear guide units that can be independently assembled and adjusted at the installation site. This segmentation allows for easy adaptation to different locations while reducing the overall assembly work requirement through standardized modular components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Device complexity

If weight and tilting moments are concentrated on one guide, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguide system complexityVSAvoiddoor leaf support reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The load support function is segmented and distributed across two linear guides spaced apart from each other. Each guide carries a portion of the door leaf weight and tilting moments, improving reliability by avoiding concentration of all loads on a single guide while maintaining reasonable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances stability, reduces assembly costs, and extends the service life of the sliding door system while ensuring safety by distributing loads between two guides, enabling easier and faster installation with reduced risk of injury.

Implementation Method 1

mounted on guide rods via heavy-duty recirculating ball or roller bearings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2129854B1Sliding door system
Publication Date: 2014.12.24 WOLF GERNOT
  • EP2129854B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a sliding door system disposed on at least one side of an opening of a building, comprising at least one sliding door wing (2) that can be displaced in a linear manner in two linear guides (8a, 8b) that are parallel to the guide profiles (10a, 10b) having C-/U-N-/L-shape. One arm of the guide profile (10a) of one of the two linear guides (8a) supports the weight of the sliding door wing (2). The invention is characterised in that one arm of the guide profile (10b) of the other linear guide (8b) also supports the weight of the sliding door wing (2). The guide profile (10a, 10b) is mounted on the guide bar (9a, 9b) by means of a high-duty ball circuit bearing, roller guide or sliding guide. Also, double linear system supports all loads for example, weight and drive and tilting moments. Due to the compact structure, the transport costs and mounting work on the construction area of the sliding door system are kept to a minimum, enabling the complete sliding door system to be premounted or preadjusted on the workplace. Additionally, the door leaf has an essentially higher stability at least counter to the exerted load in the depth direction (opening direction) and as a result has a higher service life.