Sliding Door Guide Rail with Curved Track and Two-Layer Steel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing guide devices for sliding doors, particularly those using formed sheet steel rails, face challenges in absorbing forces due to single-layer construction leading to deformation and inaccurate roller guidance, as well as high compressive loads at a single contact point.

Innovation Solution

A guide device with a convexly curved track and a concavely curved roller, featuring two spaced contact points and a two-layer track design, reduces contact pressure and improves axial guidance, while a profiling feature enhances stability and prevents layer movement, allowing for higher load transfer and improved centering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a single-layer steel sheet is used for the guide rail, then the manufacturing is simpler and cost is lower, but the force absorption capability is limited and deformation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce absorption capabilityVSAvoidlayer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide rail is divided into two layers of sheet steel that are partially in contact with one another in the area of the raceways. This segmentation allows each layer to contribute to force absorption while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure, resolving the contradiction between strength and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guide rail uses a composite structure of two layers of sheet steel, combining multiple layers to achieve enhanced force absorption capability. This composite approach allows the rail to handle higher loads without requiring a single thick layer, thus improving strength while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stress or pressure

If the roller contacts the track at a single point, then the structure is simpler, but the compressive load is high causing deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact pressureVSAvoidcontact geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The roller is designed with a concave curvature that matches the convex curvature of the track, creating a curved contact interface instead of a point contact. This curvature transformation distributes the compressive load over a larger contact area, reducing contact pressure while maintaining a relatively simple spherical-like geometry for both roller and track.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Manufacturing precision

If the roller has a large contact area with the track, then the contact pressure is reduced, but the guidance precision in the axial direction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance precisionVSAvoidcontact pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The roller and track are designed with specific curved surfaces that provide both adequate contact area for pressure distribution and precise geometric definition for accurate guidance. The concave-convex curvature pairing creates a contact zone that is large enough to reduce pressure but sufficiently constrained in shape to maintain axial guidance precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If a two-layer track design is used, then the rigidity and load transfer capability are improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The two-layer structure is implemented by stacking sheet steel layers and allowing them to contact in the raceway area, which can be achieved through relatively simple assembly processes. The segmentation into layers provides enhanced load transfer capability while avoiding the need for complex monolithic construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3574171B1Guide device
Publication Date: 2021.04.21 HETTICH HEINZE GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3574171B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3574171B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3574171B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3D

AI summary

The invention relates to a guide device, in particular for sliding doors, having a guide rail (3) made of a shaped steel plate, which has at least one track (4, 5) on which at least one running roller (10) of a running part rolls, wherein the guide rail (3) is formed with two layers in the region of the at least one track (4, 5) and the at least one track (4, 5) is curved concavely or convexly upward or downward, wherein the running roller (10) makes contact with the curved track (4, 5) at two points (15, 16) which are spaced apart from each other and which are arranged on opposite sides of a mid-plane of the track (4, 5).