Sliding Door Reinforcement Locking for Pillarless Side-Impact Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicles without a middle pillar face challenges in providing adequate structural reinforcement during side impacts, which can lead to intrusion into the passenger compartment, compromising occupant safety and ease of ingress/egress.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement assembly comprising a first anchor, a second anchor, and coaxial rods that translate and rotate to engage and disengage, providing continuous structural reinforcement between the A-pillar and C-pillar, anchoring the doors and limiting intrusion during impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a middle pillar is removed to allow more space for ingress and egress, then ease of operation is improved, but structural strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of ingress and egressVSAvoidstructural reinforcement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement system is divided into multiple segments: a first reinforcement member associated with the first door and a second reinforcement member associated with the second door. These segments can independently engage and disengage, allowing the system to provide structural support when needed while maintaining door functionality. The segmentation enables the reinforcement to be distributed across multiple components rather than requiring a single continuous middle pillar.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement members are designed to dynamically engage and disengage based on door position. When doors are closed, the reinforcement members extend to provide structural support between pillars. When doors open, the reinforcement members retract or disengage to allow free door movement. This dynamic behavior resolves the contradiction by making the structural support conditional rather than permanent, eliminating the need for a fixed middle pillar.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If reinforcement members are extended to provide continuous structural support, then strength is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous structural reinforcementVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement members are integrated with the door structures themselves. The first reinforcement member is associated with the first door and the second reinforcement member is associated with the second door, combining the door function with the reinforcement function. This merging reduces overall system complexity by eliminating separate reinforcement mechanisms that would need to be independently controlled and coordinated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement members automatically engage and disengage based on door movement without requiring external control systems. As the doors move between open and closed positions, the reinforcement members self-adjust their state through mechanical interaction with the door structures and anchoring mechanisms, eliminating the need for complex control systems, sensors, or actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If anchors are made rotatable to enable engagement and disengagement, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement and disengagement capabilityVSAvoidrotational alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The rotatable anchors are designed with rotational symmetry that allows them to engage with corresponding features on the reinforcement members at specific angular positions. The anchoring mechanisms create natural engagement positions where the rotational degrees of freedom are constrained by the geometry of interacting components, reducing the need for high-precision rotational alignment during manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates mechanical features that guide the anchors into proper rotational alignment during the engagement process. The anchoring mechanisms include features such as tapered surfaces, guide slots, or cam profiles that progressively align the rotatable anchors as they move into engagement, cushioning against misalignment and reducing the need for pre-alignment precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11919373B2Locking mechanism for slideable vehicle doors
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11919373B2 patent drawing
  • US11919373B2 patent drawing
  • US11919373B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An assembly for a vehicle includes a first door and a second door movable from an open position to a closed position. The assembly includes a first anchor supported by the first pillar movable along an axis to an engaged position. The assembly includes a first rod supported by the first door movable along an axis to an engaged position. The assembly includes a second rod supported by the second door movable along the axis to an engaged position. The first anchor is lockingly engaged with the first rod when first anchor is in the engaged position. The first rod is lockingly engaged with the second rod when the first rod is in the engaged position and the first anchor is in the engaged position.