Sliding Door Roller Assembly for Single-Track Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Double-sliding door systems in autonomous vehicles require improved roller assemblies to maintain stability and prevent unwanted movement and noise when one track member is omitted, as existing solutions lack sufficient support and torque counteraction.

Innovation Solution

The roller assembly incorporates a bracket structure with a first and second vertical guide roller, a resiliently arranged rotatable member, and at least one outer horizontal guide roller to interact with the track member, providing enhanced stability and counteracting torque in multiple directions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If one track member is omitted to simplify the door system, then device complexity is reduced, but stability and support for the door weight deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of track membersVSAvoiddoor stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The roller assembly is divided into multiple independent roller elements (first vertical guide roller, second vertical guide roller, resiliently arranged rotatable member, outer horizontal guide roller) that each contact different surfaces of the track member, distributing the support function across multiple contact points rather than relying on a single track member

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The roller assembly contacts the track member at multiple dimensional levels - vertical surfaces (inner vertical surface), horizontal surfaces (first inner surface, second inner surface), and outer vertical surfaces, creating a multi-dimensional support structure that compensates for the omitted track member

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If one track member is omitted, then device complexity is reduced, but counteraction of torque in multiple directions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of track membersVSAvoidtorque counteraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

Different roller elements are positioned to contact specific local surfaces of the track member (inner vertical surface, first inner surface, second inner surface, outer vertical surface), with each contact point providing localized force counteraction in specific directions, collectively addressing torque in multiple directions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The resiliently arranged rotatable member provides active counteraction to torque forces through its resilient mounting, which allows it to deflect and absorb torque in multiple directions while maintaining contact with the track member

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Stability of the object's composition

If a resiliently arranged rotatable member is added to improve stability, then door stability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor stabilityVSAvoidroller assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The resiliently arranged rotatable member acts as an intermediary element between the roller assembly and the track member, providing a compliant contact point that absorbs variations in track member alignment and provides active torque counteraction through its resilient mounting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures increased stability and reduced torque, allowing the door to open and close smoothly without oscillation, even when one track member is omitted, and can be adapted for various door types and weights.

Implementation Method 1

A resiliently arranged rotatable member (8) arranged to interact with a second inner surface (7b) of the track member (1c)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a first inner horizontal guide roller (4a) and a second inner horizontal guide roller (4b) arranged to interact with an inner vertical surface (5) of the track member (1c)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3859108B1Roller assembly for a sliding vehicle door
Publication Date: 2024.04.03 NINGBO GEELY AUTOMOBILE RES & DEV CO LTD
  • EP3859108B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3859108B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP3859108B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a roller assembly (2c) for a sliding vehicle door (100). The roller assembly (2c) comprises a bracket structure (3) comprising a first and second inner horizontal guide roller (4a, 4b) arranged to interact with an inner vertical surface (5) of the track member (1c). The bracket structure (3) further comprises at least a first and second vertical guide roller (6a, 6b) arranged to interact with a first inner surface of the track member (1c), a resiliently arranged rotatable member (8) arranged to interact with a second inner surface of the track member (1c) and at least one outer horizontal guide roller (9a, 9b) arranged to interact with an outer vertical surface (10) of the track member (1c). The invention also relates to a system comprising a roller assembly (2c) for a sliding vehicle door (100) and a track member (1c) of a vehicle (20).