Sliding Fork Assembly for Variable-Width Warehouse Aisles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Warehousing robots are limited to operating in aisles of a specific width due to the inability to adjust the fork body's distance relative to the shelving unit, affecting their adaptability and the functionality of components like code reading cameras.

Innovation Solution

A fork assembly with a mounting frame slidably mounted to a lifting beam, equipped with a traverse movement enabling mechanism that allows the mounting frame to move transversely, adjusting the fork body's position and overcoming the rotation radius limitation, along with a rotating assembly and telescopic arms for versatile operation in different aisle widths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the fork body is fixed at a constant distance from the lifting beam, then the structure is simple and stable, but the robot cannot operate in aisles of different widths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different aisle widthsVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting frame is made movable relative to the lifting beam through a sliding mechanism, allowing the fork body to dynamically adjust its position in the width direction. This transforms the fixed structure into a dynamic one that can adapt to different aisle widths while maintaining operational stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system is divided into separable components: the lifting beam, the sliding mounting frame, and the fork body. This segmentation allows independent adjustment of the fork body position relative to the lifting beam, enabling adaptability without requiring complete structural redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the fork body can adjust its position to operate in different aisle widths, then adaptability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different aisle widthsVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting frame serves as an intermediary component between the lifting beam and the fork body. It provides the sliding mechanism that enables position adjustment while simplifying the overall control structure, as the mounting frame handles the adjustment function without requiring complex control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting frame is designed with multi-functionality: it serves as both a support structure for the fork body and a sliding mechanism for position adjustment. This universal design reduces the need for additional separate adjustment mechanisms, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250320095A1Fork assembly and warehousing robot
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 HAI ROBOTICS CO LTD
  • US20250320095A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320095A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320095A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fork assembly includes a lifting beam, a traverse movement enabling mechanism, a mounting frame, and a fork body arranged on the mounting frame. The mounting frame is slidably mounted to the lifting beam. The traverse movement enabling mechanism is arranged between the mounting frame and the lifting beam. The traverse movement enabling mechanism is configured to drive the mounting frame to move along a first direction relative to the lifting beam, to adjust a distance between the fork body and a warehousing shelving unit.