Sliding Gate Runner Rail with Segmented Support

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sliding gates and doors, especially those for outdoor use, face challenges in achieving a compact, aesthetically pleasing, and highly stable design without the need for support rollers, which often result in unsatisfactory stability and increased substructure height.

Innovation Solution

A device featuring a shorter running rail with rolling or sliding elements attached to its ends, allowing it to be easily moved over a longer rail, with a solid support element that can absorb weight and provide stability, and incorporating spring-loaded rollers to manage heavy loads and prevent tilting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If support rollers are used to enable the gate to move, then the gate can be operated with little force, but the substructure height increases and aesthetic requirements are not satisfied

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a vertical support structure (rollers positioned one above the other in S-shaped rail) to a horizontal support configuration (shorter running rail with rolling elements at its ends). This dimensional change allows the gate to be supported and moved while maintaining a compact substructure height, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and aesthetic appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If rollers are positioned one above the other in S-shaped rail, then the gate can be supported, but the substructure height increases and stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the support function by distributing rolling elements at both ends of the shorter running rail, rather than using a single vertical stack of rollers. This segmentation provides stable support while maintaining compact substructure height, eliminating the tendency to tilt during movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the spatial arrangement from vertical stacking of rollers to horizontal distribution at rail ends, achieving stable support with reduced substructure height.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a solid support element is used to absorb weight, then stability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the support element with the running rail system, where the shorter running rail is directly supported by the solid support element. This integration provides stable weight absorption while maintaining a simple, compact overall structure, avoiding increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves a compact, stable substructure that supports heavy gates or doors effectively, reducing the risk of tilting and extending the service life of the moving parts while maintaining aesthetic appeal and ease of operation.

Implementation Method 1

rolling elements and/or sliding elements are provided on the shorter running rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling friction: Roller

Implementation Method 2

rolling elements and/or sliding elements are provided on the shorter running rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSliding friction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

spring-loaded rollers to manage heavy loads and prevent tilting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 4

spring-loaded rollers to manage heavy loads and prevent tilting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 5

The intended support or holding element, which can be fixed on the bottom side, can be solid, z. B. made of steel, and ensures a good dissipation of the weight of the goal in the ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2041385B1Apparatus for sliding gates or sliding doors
Publication Date: 2019.08.07
  • EP2041385B1 patent drawingFigure 1I~2
  • EP2041385B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2041385B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a device (1) for slidable devices such as sliding gates or sliding doors. In order to render possible a compact and nevertheless stable construction of the device (1), it is provided according to the invention that the device (1) has a supporting or retaining device (2) and a shorter runner rail (3) as well as a longer runner rail (4), wherein rolling elements (5) and/or sliding elements are provided on the supporting or retaining element (2), via which rolling elements and/or sliding elements the shorter runner rail (3) can be moved, and wherein further rolling elements (6) and/or sliding elements are provided on the shorter runner rail (3) and optionally on the supporting or retaining element (2), via which further rolling elements and/or sliding elements the longer runner rail (4) can be moved.