Sliding Pendulum Seismic Isolation with Segmented Bearings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sliding pendulum seismic isolation systems are costly and less effective for service level earthquakes, as they are designed primarily for stronger design level earthquakes, leading to increased costs and reduced protection for structures during service level earthquakes due to larger displacement requirements.

Innovation Solution

Configuring multiple independent sliding pendulum mechanisms in series, with varying effective lengths and frictions that activate at different seismic motion strengths, and specific bearing configurations tailored to support types and loads, to reduce seismic forces and costs by optimizing performance for different earthquake levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If sliding pendulum bearings are designed for design level earthquakes, then they can resist strong seismic forces, but they become less effective and more costly for service level earthquakes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic force resistanceVSAvoidprotection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing is divided into multiple independent sliding pendulum mechanisms with different effective lengths and friction coefficients. Each mechanism is optimized for specific earthquake intensity levels, allowing the system to provide appropriate protection for both service level and design level earthquakes rather than being over-designed for the strongest event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the bearing have different friction coefficients and pendulum lengths tailored to specific earthquake scenarios. The bearing surfaces and sliders are configured with varying local properties to optimize performance for different earthquake intensities, with lower friction for service level events and higher friction for design level events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Length of moving object

If bearings are designed to accommodate maximum credible earthquake displacements, then they meet building code requirements, but costs of bearings and structural frames increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplacement capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The displacement capacity is segmented across multiple mechanisms with different travel ranges. Each mechanism handles a portion of the total displacement, allowing the system to accommodate large maximum credible earthquake displacements without requiring each individual component to be oversized and expensive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing system dynamically adjusts its characteristics through the sequential activation of different sliding pendulum mechanisms. As displacement increases from service level to design level to maximum credible earthquake levels, different mechanisms engage, providing cost-effective accommodation of varying displacement demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If all sliders slide in unison during seismic movements, then the system has one effective pendulum length, but it cannot optimize performance for different earthquake intensities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidearthquake intensity adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The slider assembly is segmented into multiple independent sliding pendulum mechanisms that can operate independently. Each mechanism has its own slider(s) that can slide at different rates and engage at different displacement thresholds, enabling the system to adapt to varying earthquake intensities while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces earthquake forces and displacements on structures, lowers the cost of isolation bearings and structural frames, and effectively accommodates various seismic loads and displacements, making the system more cost-effective and efficient across different earthquake intensities.

Implementation Method 1

The friction, which occurs between the sliders and the concave surfaces, serves the important function of dissipating the energy associated with the seismic movements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The lifting of the structure results in an equivalent pendulum motion. The radii of curvature of the concave surfaces result in an effective length of the pendulum arm, that determines the dynamic natural period of vibration of the isolation system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPendulum: Pendulum

Data Source

PatentUS8484911B2Sliding pendulum seismic isolation system
Publication Date: 2013.07.16 EARTHQUAKE PROTECTION SYSTEMS INC
  • US8484911B2 patent drawing
  • US8484911B2 patent drawing
  • US8484911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inventive method is presented for a sliding pendulum seismic isolation system that reduces seismic forces on the supported structure and reduces the costs of the isolation bearings, seismic gaps, and supported structural frame. The inventive method is to configure the isolation system to achieve increased effective friction with increased displacement amplitudes, and to employ specific bearing configurations that suit the different types and magnitudes of loads present at particular structure support locations. Three bearing configurations are presented which are comprised of multiple sliders that slide along different concave spherical surfaces, each constituting an independent sliding pendulum mechanism having a specified pendulum length and friction. Two bearing configurations are presented which are comprised of multiple sliders that slide along different concave or convex cylindrical surfaces, one configured to carry both compression and tension loads, and one configured to be cost-effective for carrying light compression loads and accommodating large displacements.