Automated Blotting Device Using Sliding Substrates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electroblotting techniques are costly, time-consuming, require skilled practitioners, and yield non-reproducible and non-quantitative data due to variability in sample handling and transfer efficiency, leading to incomplete detection of analytes and loss of sample information.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising two or three solid substrates with complementary half-spaces that form channels for separation and detection, allowing for automated sliding to change channel alignment and configuration, enabling efficient immobilization and detection of analytes using capture agents and access ports for fluid and electrical control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional electroblotting procedures are used, then analytes can be transferred from matrix to blot, but the procedure is time-consuming and requires skilled practitioners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransfer efficiencyVSAvoidprocedure duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The device divides the blotting surface into multiple discrete stations, each capable of independent analyte transfer. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple samples simultaneously, dramatically reducing total procedure time while maintaining transfer efficiency through automated mechanical manipulation of the blotting membrane across different stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blotting membrane is designed to be dynamically movable across multiple stations through automated mechanical means. This dynamic positioning enables the system to sequentially access different processing zones without manual intervention, reducing procedure duration while preserving transfer quality through controlled, repeatable positioning at each station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual handling of blot is performed, then analytes can be processed through multiple incubations, but the procedure requires highly skilled practitioners and is not easily automated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

Each station in the device is designed with universal functionality to perform multiple processing steps including blocking, antibody incubation, washing, and detection. This multi-functionality allows a single automated device to replace multiple manual processing steps that previously required skilled practitioners, enabling full automation while maintaining processing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The device introduces automated mechanical intermediaries (robotic arms, precision positioning systems, automated fluid handling) that mediate between the control system and the blotting membrane. These intermediaries enable complex multi-step processing to be performed automatically without direct human manipulation, reducing skill requirements while preserving processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If large excess of binding partners is used, then analytes can be detected with adequate sensitivity, but reagent costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidreagent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The device implements localized processing zones at each station where binding partners are applied only to specific regions of the blotting membrane containing relevant analytes. This local application rather than blanket coverage of the entire membrane reduces reagent consumption while maintaining detection sensitivity in the regions of interest through concentrated, targeted reagent delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies binding partners in controlled, partial amounts sufficient for detection at each station rather than using large excess throughout the entire procedure. The automated sequential processing allows each station to use minimal necessary reagent volumes, reducing total consumption while maintaining adequate sensitivity through the cumulative effect of multiple processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Loss of information

If traditional electroblotting is performed, then analytes can be transferred to blot, but information about sample composition may be lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample information preservationVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device adds a spatial dimension to the blotting process by arranging multiple processing stations in sequence along the blotting membrane path. This dimensional expansion allows simultaneous preservation of spatial information about sample composition while performing multiple processing operations, as each station can capture and maintain positional data about analytes at different locations along the membrane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device facilitates automated, efficient, and reproducible separation, immobilization, and detection of analytes, reducing costs and variability, and enabling multiplexed sample processing while preserving information about the sample composition.

Implementation Method 1

Electroblotting is often paired with, and performed immediately after, a technique such as electrophoresis that separates the analytes in the matrix on the basis of size or charge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrophoresis: Electrophoresis

Implementation Method 2

The technique involves applying a potential difference across a matrix in which charged analytes, such as DNA, RNA, or protein, are distributed. The potential difference causes the analytes to migrate out of the matrix and become deposited on a surface or 'blot' next to the matrix

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroblotting: Electrophoretic Deposition

Implementation Method 3

Some of these blotting techniques can be performed in the absence of an applied potential difference, with the transfer of analytes from the matrix to the blot instead driven by capillary action

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentEP2986968B1Automated blotting using sliding devices
Publication Date: 2019.05.08 BIO RAD LABORATORIES INC
  • EP2986968B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP2986968B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP2986968B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Devices, systems, methods, and kits are provided for performing separation, immobilization, blotting, and/or detection of analytes from biological samples. In some embodiments, the devices are constructed from two solid substrates with surfaces in contact. The devices include a plurality of channels formed from indentations in these surfaces. The indentations can be aligned with each other across the interface between the substrates, and realigned by shifting or sliding one substrate relative to the other. In some embodiments, the devices are constructed from three layers of a solid substrate. A separation channel in the middle layer of the device is first used for analyte separation. The middle layer can then be slid relative the top and/or bottom layer, thereby aligning the separation channel with a blotting membrane. Analytes can then be transferred to the membrane using electrodes in the top and bottom layers.