Sliding Wall Movable Sealing Strips for Low-Friction Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sliding walls face challenges in achieving effective sealing between the frame and sash without the use of complex mechanisms or large magnets, which can obstruct visibility and require additional components like compressors or large magnets.

Innovation Solution

A sealing arrangement with movable sealing strips perpendicularly arranged in the frame's guide channel, driven by a mechanical or electric drive mechanism, allowing the strips to move perpendicular to the sash for sealing and opening the gap, forming a sealing frame around the sash for enhanced tightness and sound insulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If brush seals are used to seal the gap between the sliding sash and frame, then sealing is provided, but the sealing effect is limited and the forces required to move the sliding sash increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectVSAvoidforces required to move the sliding sash
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing strip is designed to be movable rather than fixed, allowing it to dynamically adjust its position. In the closed position, it extends to seal the gap effectively. During opening/moving, it can be retracted or moved aside by the drive mechanism, reducing friction and the forces required to move the sliding sash.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sealing strip is positioned and adjusted in advance to optimal sealing contact when the sliding sash is closed. The drive mechanism ensures the sealing strip is already in the correct position before closing, maximizing sealing effect while minimizing the force needed to maintain contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If an inflatable seal is used to seal the gap, then tight sealing is achieved, but a compressor and pneumatic components are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetight sealingVSAvoidcompressor and pneumatic components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the pneumatic system (compressor, hoses, valves) with a simpler mechanical drive mechanism. This mechanical system directly moves the sealing strip into and out of the sealing position, achieving the same tight sealing effect without requiring compressed air infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The complex pneumatic components (compressor, control valves, hoses) are extracted and removed from the system. Only the essential sealing function is retained, implemented through a simpler mechanical movement of the sealing strip controlled by a basic drive mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If a movable auxiliary frame with seal is used to press the sash against the frame, then sealing is improved, but visibility through the sliding sash is obstructed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesealingVSAvoidvisibility through the sliding sash
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The movable auxiliary frame structure is removed entirely. Instead, only a thin sealing strip is used, which can be moved into the sealing position without obstructing the view through the glass. The sealing function is separated from the structural frame elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sealing function is localized to a thin strip element rather than a substantial frame structure. This localized approach provides effective sealing at the gap interface while maintaining visual transparency through the majority of the sliding sash area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If magnets of large size are used to mount the sliding sash, then mounting is achieved, but the size significantly exceeds the schematic illustration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting strengthVSAvoidmagnet size
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic mounting system is replaced with a mechanical guide channel and roller system. The guide channels provide structural support and positioning, while rollers enable smooth movement. This mechanical approach achieves the required mounting strength without the bulk of large magnets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4060158B1Sliding wall with seal
Publication Date: 2025.10.15 SCHUECO INTERNATIONAL KG
  • EP4060158B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP4060158B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4060158B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

A sliding wall comprising at least the following: at least one sliding sash (3), a frame (2) comprising at least one receiving and guide channel (4) in which the at least one sliding sash (3) is slidably guided, and a sealing arrangement for at least partially sealing a gap (S) between the frame (2) and the sliding sash (3) at least in a closed position of the sliding sash (3), is characterized in that the sealing arrangement comprises at least one sealing strip (5) arranged in the receiving and guide channel (4) of the frame (2) and movable perpendicularly or substantially perpendicular to a main plane of the sliding sash (3), which is movable into a gap-sealing position (I) in which it rests against the sliding sash (3) and a gap-open position (II) in which it does not rest against the sliding sash or does not rest substantially against it.