Sliding Window Reed-Solomon Decoder for Low-Latency ECC

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional serial error correcting code (ECC) decoders struggle with scaling up to high transmission speeds, leading to increased latency and a higher likelihood of silent data corruption, especially with burst errors, as they require multiple clock cycles and grow exponentially in processing complexity with the size of the codeword.

Innovation Solution

Implementing multiple Parallel Error Correctors (PECs) using Reed-Solomon matrix multipliers in hardware, which run concurrently to recompute and compare symbols, allowing for faster error correction and identification of error positions, and using a sliding window list decoder to parallelize the processing of Reed-Solomon encoded codewords.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional serial ECC decoders are used, then the processing complexity grows exponentially with codeword size, but transmission speed scaling is limited and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission speedVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decoder is divided into multiple parallel error corrector units, each handling a portion of the codeword simultaneously. This segmentation allows the system to process larger codewords at higher speeds without exponentially increasing overall complexity, as each unit maintains manageable complexity while working in parallel with others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from serial processing (one-dimensional time sequence) to parallel processing (adding spatial dimension with multiple concurrent units). This dimensional change enables the system to achieve high transmission speeds by distributing the computational load across multiple units operating simultaneously, rather than sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple clock cycles are used for error correction, then correction power increases, but latency increases proportionally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple error corrector units are prepared and configured in advance to process different portions of the codeword simultaneously. This preliminary arrangement of parallel processing units allows the system to achieve high correction power without the latency penalty of sequential multi-cycle processing, as all corrections occur in parallel within a single or reduced number of clock cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If serial processing is used for Reed-Solomon decoding, then implementation is simpler, but silent data corruption occurs more frequently with burst errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidsilent data corruption rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The codeword is segmented into multiple portions, each processed by a dedicated error corrector unit. This segmentation ensures that burst errors affecting one portion do not propagate undetected through the entire decoding process, as other parallel units continue to validate their respective portions independently, thereby reducing silent data corruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If correction power is increased to handle larger errors, then error coverage improves, but latency increases with the number of symbols to correct

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror coverageVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a spatial dimension to error correction by deploying multiple parallel processing units, each capable of handling correction independently. This allows the system to increase error coverage across the entire codeword without proportionally increasing latency, as all corrections occur concurrently rather than sequentially through a single unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9722632B2Sliding window list decoder for error correcting codes
Publication Date: 2017.08.01 STREAMSCALE INC
  • US9722632B2 patent drawing
  • US9722632B2 patent drawing
  • US9722632B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for hardware error-correcting code (ECC) detection or correction of a received codeword from an original codeword includes an error-detecting circuit configured to process a selection of symbols of the received codeword using a set of factors, the original codeword being recomputable from a corresponding said selection of symbols of the original codeword using the set of factors. The error-detecting circuit includes a hardware multiplier and accumulator configured to use the set of factors and the selection of symbols of the received codeword to recompute remaining symbols of the original codeword, and a hardware comparator configured to compare the recomputed remaining symbols of the original codeword with corresponding said remaining symbols of the received codeword and to output first results of this comparison.