Sliding Window Radiation Detection for Moving Sources

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radiation detection systems face a trade-off between accurate detection and localization of moving radiation sources, as long integration times improve detection but increase uncertainty, while short integration times enhance localization but may lead to false alarms and reduced detection performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a sliding window integration method that combines long and short integration times to achieve precise localization of radiation sources, where a long integration time window is applied initially, followed by a short window to track the source's movement, allowing for accurate detection and localization of moving radiation sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If long integration time is used, then detection accuracy is improved, but localization precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidlocalization precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the integration process into two distinct stages: a first integration period for detection and a second integration period for localization. This segmentation allows each stage to use optimized integration times - longer for detection accuracy and shorter for localization precision - thereby resolving the contradiction between the two requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the integration time based on the operational stage. The system transitions from a longer integration period during the detection phase to a shorter integration period during the localization phase, making the integration time adaptive rather than fixed, thus optimizing both detection accuracy and localization precision at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If short integration time is used, then localization precision is improved, but detection performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization precisionVSAvoiddetection performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the operational timeline into two phases: an initial phase using short integration time for rapid localization, and a subsequent phase using longer integration time for accurate detection. This temporal segmentation ensures that localization precision is achieved without compromising overall detection performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary localization using short integration time before committing to a longer detection integration period. This preliminary action establishes the source location quickly, allowing the system to then optimize for detection accuracy in the subsequent phase without risking missed detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If long integration time is used, then false alarms are reduced, but detection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm reductionVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection process into two time segments: a first integration period optimized for reducing false alarms through longer averaging, and a second integration period for rapid confirmation. This segmentation reduces the overall detection time while maintaining false alarm reduction benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous integration operations across both phases, where the second integration period overlaps or follows immediately after the first. This continuous action ensures that detection time is minimized while the cumulative effect of both integration periods maintains low false alarm rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS8700359B2System and method for detection of radiation
Publication Date: 2014.04.15 HONEYWELL SAFETY PRODUCTS USA INC
  • US8700359B2 patent drawing
  • US8700359B2 patent drawing
  • US8700359B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a count detector, a communication medium; and a processor coupled to the count detector. The processor continuously receives a plurality of pulses from the count detector. A pulse indicates a detection of a radiation unit emitted from a source material or a background. The processor determines a first period of time based on an expected range of speed of a carrier of the source material, and integrates the plurality of pulses over the first period of time, thereby yielding an integrated count associated with a time at a midpoint of the first period of time. The processor creates a continuous time series of count profiles from a plurality of integrated counts that are computed using a plurality of windows within the first period of time, and shifts each window over a second period of time. The second period of time is shorter than the first period of time. The processor estimates a background count from a history of the count profiles, computes an adaptive threshold based on the estimated background count, and detects the source material when consecutives of the integrated counts exceed the adaptive threshold.