SLO Maintenance via Constraint Propagation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Site reliability engineers face challenges in maintaining service level objectives (SLOs) in container orchestration platforms due to the negative externalities caused by rebalancing resource allocation, leading to inefficient use of additional resources when resolving SLO violations.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses constraint propagation to detect violations of service level objectives and determines remediation measures by modeling resource dependencies and relationships within a target cluster, minimizing impact on other SLOs through cloud service automation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If resource rebalancing is performed to resolve SLO violations, then service level objectives are restored, but negative externalities occur affecting other SLOs and resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice level objective maintenanceVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by generating a first set of constraints corresponding to service requirements for SLOs and a second set of constraints corresponding to relationships within the target cluster between resources and resource dependencies. This preliminary constraint generation enables the system to predict and evaluate potential remediation measures before executing resource rebalancing, thereby avoiding negative externalities on other SLOs and optimizing resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously detects violations of the first set of constraints and uses this feedback to dynamically determine appropriate remediation measures. By monitoring SLO violations in real-time and adjusting resource allocation based on constraint satisfaction, the system restores service level objectives while minimizing adverse impacts on other workloads and resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If additional resources are deployed to resolve SLO violations, then service reliability is improved, but resource deployment efficiency decreases due to brute-force approach

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice level objective restorationVSAvoidresource deployment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Before deploying additional resources, the system generates constraints corresponding to service requirements and relationships within the target cluster. This preliminary constraint analysis enables the system to evaluate whether additional resource deployment is necessary and to determine the most efficient remediation measure, thereby avoiding unnecessary brute-force resource deployment and improving resource deployment efficiency while maintaining service reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically determines remediation measures by propagating constraints through the resource dependency model and selecting appropriate actions without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability enables efficient resource management by automatically resolving SLO violations through optimal remediation measures rather than indiscriminate resource deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If constraint propagation is used to determine remediation measures, then resource reallocation impact is minimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource reallocation impactVSAvoidconstraint propagation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex resource management problem into manageable components by generating a first set of constraints corresponding to service requirements and a second set of constraints corresponding to relationships within the target cluster. This segmentation of constraints enables systematic propagation and analysis, allowing the system to minimize resource reallocation impact while managing system complexity through structured constraint organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The constraint propagation mechanism acts as an intermediary between SLO violations and remediation measures. By introducing constraints as intermediate representations that model service requirements and resource relationships, the system bridges the gap between detecting violations and determining appropriate remediation, thereby minimizing resource reallocation impact while managing complexity through the intermediary constraint layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240281287A1Service level objective maintenance using constraint propagation
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240281287A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281287A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281287A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment for maintaining service level objectives in container orchestration platforms using constraint propagation. The embodiment may receive a set of service level objectives associated with deployment of an application. The embodiment may determine a series of resource dependencies corresponding to the received set of service level objectives for the application. The embodiment may generate a first set of constraints corresponding to service requirements for the received set of service level objectives. The embodiment may generate a second set of constraints corresponding to relationships within a target cluster between the target cluster resources and the series of resource dependencies. The embodiment may detect violations of the first set of constraints, and then determine one or more remediation measures to restore the received set of service level objectives based on the second set of constraints to output the one or more remediation measures to an end user.