Slot Machine Processor Switching Between Fixed and Progressive Payout Modes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional slot machines lack flexibility in payout values and are not compatible with progressive payout systems, limiting entertainment value and versatility.

Innovation Solution

A slot machine with a processor that allows selection between a first game mode with fixed payouts and a second game mode with progressive payouts, enabling variable award values and improved entertainment characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed payout table is used in conventional slot machines, then the payout value is determined and simple to operate, but the machine cannot accommodate progressive payout systems and lacks versatility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with progressive payout systemVSAvoidpayout determination system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic payout determination system where the payout value changes based on the selected game mode. The processor dynamically switches between fixed payout values and progressive payout values, allowing the same machine to adapt to different payout systems without hardware changes. This resolves the contradiction by making the payout system flexible and adaptable while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal slot machine that can perform both fixed payout and progressive payout functions through a single device. By incorporating a mode selection mechanism and a payout determination system that responds to mode signals, the machine achieves multi-functionality, accommodating different payout systems without requiring separate machines for each type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the payout value is fixed for each winning combination, then the payout table is simple to manage, but the entertainment characteristic is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariability of award valuesVSAvoidpayout table management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts payout values based on the selected game mode. In the first game mode, fixed payout values are used for simplicity, while in the second game mode, progressive payout values that accumulate and vary are implemented. This dynamic adaptation allows the machine to provide variable award values for enhanced entertainment while maintaining simple payout table management when operating in fixed mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the payout parameter based on the game mode selection. The processor receives a mode signal and accordingly changes the payout determination parameter between fixed values and progressive values. This parameter change mechanism enables the same payout table structure to support both fixed and variable payout schemes, balancing entertainment variability with operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a progressive payout system is implemented, then the entertainment characteristic is improved through variable awards, but the machine cannot simultaneously support fixed payout modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayout system flexibilityVSAvoidpayout determination system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic payout determination system where the payout value changes based on the selected game mode. The processor dynamically switches between fixed payout values and progressive payout values, allowing the same machine to adapt to different payout systems without hardware changes. This resolves the contradiction by making the payout system flexible and adaptable while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the payout determination function into two distinct modes: fixed payout mode and progressive payout mode. By dividing the payout system into separable operational modes that can be independently selected, the machine can support both fixed and progressive payout systems without creating unnecessary complexity. Each mode operates independently with its own payout determination logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8012012B2Slot machine
Publication Date: 2011.09.06 UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT CORP
  • US8012012B2 patent drawing
  • US8012012B2 patent drawing
  • US8012012B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A processor selects either a first game mode or a second game mode based on the operation by the operator carried out at a server 102. If the first game mode has been selected, a payout is calculated and awarded based on a fixed payout set in advance for each winning combination. Alternatively, if the second game mode has been selected, a payout is calculated and awarded based on a progressive payout and a fixed payout which was set in advance for each winning combination.