Slotted Hinge Structure for Low-Force Steerable Instruments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing steerable surgical instruments face limitations in bendability, requiring high bending forces and having limited fatigue life due to elastic deformation or separation of parts, making handling and assembly difficult.

Innovation Solution

A cylindrical element with a hinge structure featuring a slotted design that allows for improved bendability, enabling high deflection without fatigue and maintaining structural integrity, using techniques like laser cutting to create flexible zones that can rotate freely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional steering cables or elastic deformation methods are used, then the instrument can achieve bending capability, but the bending force required is high and the fatigue life is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending forceVSAvoidfatigue life
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cylindrical element is divided into multiple portions that can rotate freely relative to each other at the hinge location. This segmentation allows each portion to move independently, reducing the force required for bending and eliminating fatigue issues associated with elastic deformation of a single continuous structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical state of the hinge from an elastic deformation mechanism to a rigid rotation mechanism. By creating a hinge with a slotted structure that allows free rotation between portions, the system transitions from relying on material elasticity to relying on mechanical articulation, thereby reducing required bending force and eliminating fatigue limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If elastic deformation is used to provide flexibility, then the instrument can bend, but the bending capability is limited and handling becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehandlingVSAvoidbending capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The cylindrical element is segmented into multiple rotatable portions at the hinge, enabling greater and more controlled bending capability compared to elastic deformation. This segmentation allows the instrument to achieve larger deflection angles and improves handling by providing predictable, mechanical articulation rather than limited elastic bending.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If the hinge structure is made robust to maintain structural integrity, then the instrument can withstand forces, but the bendability and flexibility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidbendability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge structure is segmented into multiple portions that rotate relative to each other. Each portion can be designed with sufficient strength to maintain structural integrity, while the articulation between portions provides the necessary bendability. This resolves the contradiction by distributing structural requirements across multiple strong components rather than requiring a single continuous structure to be both strong and flexible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge employs a composite structure combining rigid portions with a slotted configuration that allows rotation. This composite design maintains structural integrity through the rigid portions while achieving bendability through the articulated slotted structure, eliminating the need to choose between strength and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional hinge designs are used, then the instrument can achieve flexibility, but the assembly complexity increases and manufacturing becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly complexityVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge structure is merged into a single cylindrical element as an integral feature rather than being assembled from separate components. The slotted structure that enables rotation is formed directly in the cylindrical element, eliminating the need for separate hinges, pins, or connectors, thereby simplifying assembly and manufacturing while maintaining flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces complex mechanical hinge assemblies with a slotted structure that provides rotation through its geometry alone. This substitution eliminates the need for multiple mechanical components (pins, bushings, retainers) and simplifies both manufacturing and assembly while preserving the required flexibility and bendability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20260076707A1Steerable instrument comprising a hinge with a slotted structure
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 FORTIMEDIX ASSETS II BV
  • US20260076707A1 patent drawing
  • US20260076707A1 patent drawing
  • US20260076707A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cylindrical element with a hinge structure has:a first portion (524; 1124; 522(n−1); 1122(n−1));a second portion (522(1); 1122(1); 522(n); 1122(n)) which is rotatable relative to the first portion (524; 1124; 522(n−1); 1122(n−1)) about two rotation sections (530(1); 1130(1); 530(n); 1130(n)) arranged at locations 180° rotated relative to one another viewed in a tangential direction of the cylindrical element;an attachment element (502(1); 1006; 502(n)).The rotation sections (530(1); 1130(1); 530(n); 1130(n)) are implemented by:either the first portion (524; 1124; 522(n−1); 1122(n−1)) or the second portion (522(1); 1122(1); 522(n); 1122(n)) is provided with an opening accommodating a pin (556(1); 1156(1); 556(n); 1156(n));the pin (556(1); 1156(1); 556(n); 1156(n)) is attached to a portion of the attachment element (502(1); 1006; 502(n));the other one of the first portion (524; 1124; 522(n−1); 1122(n−1)) and the second portion (522(1); 1122(1); 522(n); 1122(n)) is attached to another portion of the attachment element (502(1); 1006; 502(n));such that the first portion (524; 1124; 522(n−1); 1122(n−1)) and the second portion (522(1); 1122(1); 522(n); 1122(n)) cannot move relative to one another in a longitudinal direction, a tangential direction and a radial direction but are configured to rotate relative to one another about a center of rotation.