Slow Cooker Probe Control for Multi-Mode Cooking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional slow cookers lack multiple cooking modes and automatic power-down features, leading to potential overcooking and limited user control, with controllers often inaccessible for cleaning and maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A slow cooker design featuring a controller mounted on the shell with multiple modes (probe, program, and manual) that includes a temperature probe for precise temperature control, automatic power adjustment, and a sealed control panel for protection and easy access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a conventional slow cooker with a single control dial is used, then the device is simple to manufacture and operate, but it lacks multiple cooking modes and automatic power-down features, leading to potential overcooking and limited user control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking modesVSAvoidcontroller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is segmented from the main appliance body and mounted on the exterior shell. This allows the controller to be independently accessed, removed, or cleaned without disassembling the entire slow cooker, thereby adding multiple cooking modes while managing complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller is designed to perform multiple functions: it provides various cooking modes (probe, program, manual), automatic power-down, temperature monitoring, and serves as a removable component for cleaning. This multi-functionality addresses the need for versatility without proportionally increasing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the controller is mounted on the shell with a sealed control panel, then it is protected from fluids and easily accessible for cleaning, but it requires additional sealing mechanisms and mounting structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller accessibilityVSAvoidsealing and mounting structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is extracted from the interior of the slow cooker and mounted on the exterior shell. This extraction makes the controller easily accessible for user interaction and cleaning, while the sealed control panel protects it from fluids. The mounting structure on the shell provides stable attachment without complicating the overall device design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sealed control panel design provides feedback to the user about the controller's protected status, ensuring that fluids do not compromise the electronic components. The sealing mechanism maintains integrity while allowing for removable access, balancing protection with ease of cleaning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If a temperature probe is used for precise temperature control, then overcooking is prevented, but the device requires additional components and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidcontrol mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The temperature probe provides continuous feedback to the controller, which automatically adjusts heating to maintain the desired temperature. This feedback loop enables precise temperature control and prevents overcooking, while the controller integrates this function with existing cooking modes, managing the added complexity through unified control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The temperature probe replaces manual temperature checking methods with an automated electronic sensing system. This substitution provides continuous, precise temperature monitoring and automatic control, eliminating the need for users to manually check temperatures or estimate cooking doneness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of repair

If the controller is made removable and pivotable, then it is easier to clean and maintain, but it requires additional mounting mechanisms like living hinges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller maintenanceVSAvoidmounting mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control panel is made dynamically movable through a living hinge mechanism, allowing it to pivot between a closed position (for normal operation) and an open position (for cleaning and maintenance). This dynamic design enables easy access to the controller without requiring complete disassembly, while the living hinge provides a simple, integrated mounting solution that minimizes additional complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables multiple cooking cycles, prevents overcooking by automatically adjusting heat, and allows for convenient cleaning and maintenance of the controller, enhancing cooking precision and appliance longevity.

Implementation Method 1

the basin is heated at a predetermined, relatively low temperature over an extended period of time to cook the foodstuff

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

the temperature probe is inserted into the foodstuff and transmits foodstuff temperatures to the controller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature detection:

Data Source

PatentUS7605349B2Slow cooker and method of operation
Publication Date: 2009.10.20 HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS INC
  • US7605349B2 patent drawing
  • US7605349B2 patent drawing
  • US7605349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooking appliance for cooking a foodstuff over a period of time including a shell having a heating cavity and a heating element to heat the heating cavity. A container is removably positionable within the heating cavity and includes a food cavity for receiving the foodstuff. A temperature probe is removably insertable into the foodstuff and a controller is mounted to the shell. The controller controls operation of the cooking appliance in a probe mode wherein the temperature probe is inserted into the foodstuff and transmits foodstuff temperatures to the controller for controlling the heating of the foodstuff, a program mode wherein the controller actuates the heating element to heat the container at a temperature for a selected amount of time and subsequently at a lower temperature and a manual mode wherein the controller actuates the heating element to heat the container at a selected temperature.