Enzyme Treatment for Sludge Dewaterability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for dewatering sludge from wastewater treatment operations are inefficient due to the complex nature of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in sludge, which resist dewatering by binding water and maintaining mechanical integrity of sludge flocs.

Innovation Solution

Treatment of sludge with a combination of cellulase and protease enzymes, such as Novozymes Cellic CTec3 and SAVINASE, prior to conditioning and mechanical dewatering, to disrupt EPS and enhance dewaterability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional dewatering methods are used, then sludge can be dewatered, but the process is inefficient due to EPS binding water and maintaining floc integrity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedewatering efficiencyVSAvoidEPS water-binding capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the harmful water-binding capacity of EPS from the sludge system by adding enzymes that selectively hydrolyze EPS components. The enzymes break down polysaccharides and proteins in EPS, releasing bound water and disrupting the gel structure that resists dewatering, thereby separating the harmful water-binding function from the sludge flocs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition and structural parameters of EPS by introducing enzymatic hydrolysis. The enzymes modify the molecular structure of polysaccharides and proteins in EPS, altering their water-binding parameters and gel strength. This parameter change transforms EPS from a water-retaining gel matrix to a disrupted structure that releases water and allows efficient dewatering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If enzyme treatment is applied to disrupt EPS, then dewaterability is enhanced, but additional process steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedewaterabilityVSAvoidprocess steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary enzymatic treatment to sludge before the main dewatering operation. By pre-disrupting EPS structure and releasing bound water through enzyme hydrolysis, the sludge is prepared in advance for more effective mechanical dewatering. This preliminary action reduces the workload and improves the efficiency of subsequent dewatering equipment operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces enzymes as intermediary substances that mediate between the sludge EPS matrix and the dewatering process. The enzymes act as biological catalysts that selectively interact with EPS components, breaking down the gel structure and releasing water without requiring direct mechanical disruption. This intermediary action facilitates the dewatering process by transforming EPS properties before mechanical separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of substance

If sludge volume is reduced through dewatering, then disposal costs decrease, but EPS resistance to dewatering must be overcome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesludge volumeVSAvoidEPS mechanical integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts water bound by EPS from the sludge system through enzymatic hydrolysis. The enzymes break down EPS polymers and release the water they hold, separating this bound water from the sludge matrix. This extraction of bound water directly reduces sludge volume and eliminates the water-binding function of EPS, enabling more effective dewatering and volume reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful water-binding capacity and mechanical integrity of EPS into a benefit by using enzymatic hydrolysis to break down EPS structure. The same EPS components that previously resisted dewatering by holding water and maintaining floc strength are transformed into hydrolyzed products that release water and allow floc disruption. This conversion turns the EPS water-binding property from a dewatering barrier into a source of recoverable water and improved dewaterability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces sludge volume and polymer usage during dewatering, maintaining or improving the quality of the dewatered cake and filtrate, while achieving a synergistic effect that surpasses the dewatering efficiency of using enzymes alone.

Implementation Method 1

treating the sludge with an enzyme composition including Novozymes Cellic CTec3 brand enzyme composition from Novozymes A/S (Bagsvaerd, DK) and a protease such as SAVINASE brand protease from Novozymes A/S

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme hydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 2

A number of papers exist describing the use of enzymes for selective hydrolysis within the EPS to reduce the sludge volume

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic degradation: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentUS11623885B2Methods for enhancing the dewaterability of sludge with enzyme treatment
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 ENVIROZYME LLC
  • US11623885B2 patent drawing
  • US11623885B2 patent drawing
  • US11623885B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to enhancing sludge dewaterability by adding cellulase/hemicellulase enzyme mixture and protease to the sludge prior to conventional conditioning and dewatering operations.