Sludge Removal Laterals With Floor-Resting Movement Restraint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sludge removal and fluid distribution systems in sludge or waste collection containers face issues where laterals can break due to vigorous movement, necessitating anchoring to prevent damage, which is time-consuming and costly.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of movement restricting members that rest on the floor without anchoring, utilizing fluid pressure to prevent laterals from moving away from or towards the floor, thereby preventing damage without the need for anchoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If anchors are used to fix laterals to the floor, then lateral movement is prevented and reliability is improved, but installation time and cost increase due to drilling slots and applying epoxy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral stabilityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the anchoring function from the traditional anchor system and transfers it to the sludge itself. The laterals are designed to be held in position by the sludge material rather than by mechanical anchors drilled into the floor, eliminating the need for drilling and epoxy application while maintaining lateral stability during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sludge material serves a dual function: it is both the process material being handled and the medium that holds the laterals in position. The laterals are positioned within the sludge bed, and the sludge's physical presence and pressure automatically restrain lateral movement without requiring separate anchoring components or installation steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If anchors are used to fix laterals to the floor, then lateral movement is prevented and reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase due to additional anchoring components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral stabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the anchoring function from dedicated anchoring components (anchors, slots, epoxy) and transfers it to the sludge material itself. This eliminates multiple system components and simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining the essential function of preventing lateral movement during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sludge material performs multiple functions simultaneously: it is both the process material being handled and the restraint medium that prevents lateral movement of the laterals. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate anchoring systems and reduces overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If laterals are allowed to move freely, then ease of installation is improved, but reliability deteriorates as laterals may break due to vigorous movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidlateral integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a dynamic restraint system where the laterals are held in position by the sludge material during operation, rather than being rigidly fixed. The sludge's physical presence and pressure provide adaptive restraint that prevents vigorous movement and potential breakage while allowing for simple installation without anchoring components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively prevents lateral movement and subsequent damage during operation, reducing installation time and costs by eliminating the need for anchoring, while ensuring reliable sludge removal and fluid distribution.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing fluid pressure present in the sludge or waste collection device to prevent one or more laterals from moving away from the floor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS11084746B2Systems for removing sludge from or distributing fluids in sludge or waste collection vessels
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 ROBERTS MARKETING DE
  • US11084746B2 patent drawing
  • US11084746B2 patent drawing
  • US11084746B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems for use in one or more sludge or waste collection devices (e.g., containers, vessels or basins). One such system is a sludge removal system for removing sludge from one or more sludge collection devices. The sludge removal system includes one or more sludge removal grids disposed in one or more sludge collection devices. Each sludge removal grid preferably includes at least one header and a plurality of sludge collection laterals. Another such system includes a fluid distribution system for distributing one or more fluids in one or more sludge or waste collection devices. A movement restricting or prevention member is provided in both the fluid distribution and sludge removal systems to prevent or restrict movement of the sludge collection laterals and the fluid distribution laterals away from or towards a floor of a corresponding collection device without anchoring or fixing the laterals to the floor.