Sludge Thickening via Pneumatic Emulsion and Degassing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sludge thickening methods, such as mechanical systems and surface degassing processes, face issues like clogging, high operational costs, and anaerobic conditions leading to odors and increased colloidal character, with limited thickening results and long residence times.

Innovation Solution

A method involving continuous or semi-continuous treatment where air is injected into sludge at high flow rates, creating a high-speed emulsion that is then degassed and treated with a flocculant, allowing for rapid thickening and concentration without mechanical systems, using compressed or superpressed air and inexpensive reagents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If mechanical systems are used for sludge thickening, then thickening can be achieved, but the systems are liable to seize up and require unclogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethickening efficiencyVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical thickening systems with a pneumatic system that injects compressed air into the sludge stream. This substitution eliminates mechanical contact with the sludge, preventing seizing and clogging while maintaining thickening efficiency through air-induced fluidization and separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses compressed air injection (pneumatics) to fluidize and separate sludge components. The air stream creates bubbles that carry lighter particles upward while heavier particles settle, achieving thickening without mechanical moving parts that could fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Productivity

If static thickening systems are used, then sludge can be thickened, but residence times are considerable leading to anaerobic evolution and foul odors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethickening capacityVSAvoidodors and colloidal character
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous air injection and continuous sludge flow through the thickening chamber, preventing stagnant anaerobic conditions. The constant movement and aeration eliminate the development of foul odors while maintaining efficient thickening throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The injected compressed air provides oxygen that prevents anaerobic decomposition of sludge. This oxidation eliminates the formation of foul-smelling anaerobic byproducts while the air bubbles facilitate particle separation and thickening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #38Strong oxidants (Accelerated oxidation)

3Manufacturing precision

If mechanical scrapers are used in sludge thickeners, then dryness of compact sludge can be improved, but the equipment exhibits fragilities and requires unclogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesludge drynessVSAvoidmechanical equipment fragility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical scrapers with a pneumatic separation mechanism. Compressed air bubbles rise through the sludge, carrying lighter particles to the surface while heavier particles settle naturally, achieving concentration without fragile mechanical scraping components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If rotary drum thickening systems are used, then robust systems are obtained, but thickening results are limited to 30-40 g/l of DM

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem robustnessVSAvoidthickening results
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating parameters by using high-velocity compressed air injection (velocities >10m/s at the air-sludge contact point) and specific pressure drops (0.5-2 bar) to achieve superior thickening results of 100-120 g/l DM, exceeding the limitations of conventional rotary drum systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves rapid sludge decontamination and concentration, producing a solidified mud cake with porosity similar to pumice, achieving concentrations of 100 to 120 g/l with improved water quality and reduced odors and colloidal content.

Implementation Method 1

a first chamber or container is fed with the sludge in a continuous flow by simultaneously injecting air with a large flow rate (several tens, or even hundreds of Nm3/h) resulting in high velocities V of the resulting emulsion at the point of contact between the air and the sludge (V > 10m/s) (for example 50m/s), the emulsion being formed of a multitude of sludge droplets in the strong air current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEmulsion: Emulsion

Implementation Method 2

the emulsion is degassed at atmospheric pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDegassing:

Implementation Method 3

a flocculant is injected after such narrowing, said emulsion is degassed at atmospheric pressure and the whole is recovered in a filtration or settling device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlocculation: Flocculation

Implementation Method 4

in which at least one flocculant is injected, to obtain in said enclosure a second air emulsion in the coagulated and flocculated sludge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoagulation: Coagulation

Implementation Method 5

The sludge and air are injected into a first zone of the container or chamber, and the emulsion thus formed is then discharged to a second zone of the container extending over a predetermined length

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTwo-Phase Flow: Two-Phase Flow

Implementation Method 6

a determined pressure drop is created in the emulsion by narrowing in and/or at the outlet of the chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure Drop: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentEP3323487B1Method and device for treating liquid sludge, and sludge wafers obtained with such a method
Publication Date: 2020.12.30 OREGE
  • EP3323487B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3323487B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3323487B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method, a device (1) for treating and conditioning liquid sludge (2), and a solidified sludge cake obtained by such a method, in which a chamber (5, 6, 33, 52, 83, 117, 132) is fed with sludge in a continuous flow while simultaneously injecting air, resulting in a velocity V of the emulsion obtained at the point (84, 117, 133) of the air-sludge interface such that V > 10 m/s, a predetermined pressure drop is created in the emulsion by constriction (97, 140) in and/or at the outlet of the chamber, a flocculant (98, 123) is injected after such constriction, said emulsion is degassed (95, 124) to atmospheric pressure, the sludge is concentrated (128, 166, 180) downstream in a weir, and collects the whole in a filtration or decantation device (25, 48).