Slurry Polymerization Pressure Management via Segmented Differentials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In slurry polymerization processes, managing pressures downstream of a polymerization reactor is challenging due to the need for efficient recovery of solid polyolefins, which is affected by the operating pressures during product transfer.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the withdrawal of the polymerization product from a loop reactor and its conveyance through a first pressure differential followed by a second pressure differential, utilizing a continuous take-off valve and a flashline heater, where the mixture achieves a Froude number range of 5 to 100, ensuring effective pressure management and solid polymer recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If high pressure differential is applied during product transfer, then transfer speed increases, but solid polymer recovery efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct transfer speedVSAvoidsolid polymer recovery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure differential is divided into two distinct stages: a first pressure differential for initial product transfer, and a second, higher pressure differential for completing the transfer. This segmentation allows optimization of each stage independently - the first stage maintains recovery efficiency while the second stage maximizes transfer speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first pressure differential performs preliminary transfer of the polymerization product before the second pressure differential is applied. This preliminary action prepares the system for the subsequent high-pressure differential by initially moving product material, thereby reducing the risk to recovery efficiency when the higher pressure is later applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If pressure differential is increased to improve transfer efficiency, then productivity increases, but manufacturing precision of polymer recovery decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct transfer efficiencyVSAvoidpolymer recovery quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The transfer process is segmented into two pressure stages, where the first stage operates at moderate pressure to maintain recovery quality, and the second stage operates at higher pressure to maximize productivity. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing both quality and efficiency to be optimized in their respective stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure differential is dynamically adjusted through two distinct operational phases rather than maintaining a constant high pressure. This dynamic approach allows the system to achieve high productivity when needed while preserving manufacturing precision during critical transfer phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If single-stage high pressure differential is used, then device complexity is reduced, but pressure management effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control system complexityVSAvoidpressure management effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure control system is segmented into two distinct pressure differential stages, each serving a specific function in the transfer process. This segmentation improves pressure management effectiveness by optimizing each stage for its specific purpose, outweighing the moderate increase in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first pressure differential acts as an intermediary stage between the reactor and the final transfer phase. This intermediary pressure stage mediates between the high-pressure polymerization environment and the lower-pressure separation system, improving overall pressure management effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient pressure management and recovery of solid polymers by maintaining optimal pressure differentials and residence times, enhancing the transfer and separation of polymerization products.

Implementation Method 1

conveying the polymerization product slurry through a flashline heater

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

conveying the polymerization product slurry through a first line comprising a continuous take-off valve to yield a mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS8921498B2Pressure management for slurry polymerization
Publication Date: 2014.12.30 CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL COMPANY LP
  • US8921498B2 patent drawing
  • US8921498B2 patent drawing
  • US8921498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Processes and systems for the production for pressure management of a polymerization product flowing from a loop polymerization reactor to a separation vessel in a slurry polymerization system are disclosed herein. For example, a process comprises withdrawing the polymerization product from a loop polymerization reactor, and conveying the withdrawn polymerization product to a separation vessel via a first pressure differential and a second pressure differential. The withdrawn polymerization product may flow through the first pressure differential before flowing through the second pressure differential, and the first pressure differential may be less than the second pressure differential.