Switched Mode Power Supply Control Circuit Peak Current Limit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control circuits for switched mode power supplies lack effective peak current limit protection, leading to potential damage from current surges during load changes or input losses, as they struggle to quickly adjust control signals to prevent excessive current flow.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a digital control circuit with two comparators and a summer that compare current reference signals with input current signals, generating error signals to adjust the control signals and limit peak currents, thereby preventing excessive current flow through the power converter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing control circuits are used for switched mode power supplies, then the power supply can operate under normal conditions, but they lack effective peak current limit protection and cannot quickly adjust control signals to prevent excessive current flow during load changes or input losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak current limit protectionVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit is segmented into multiple functional blocks: a current compensator with two comparators (one for current control, one for peak current limiting), a driver, and a power switch. Each block performs a specific function, allowing the circuit to provide both normal current control and peak current limit protection through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The peak current reference signal is pre-established and stored in the current compensator before any current surge occurs. When the input current approaches this predetermined reference level, the comparator immediately detects the condition and adjusts the control signal to prevent excessive current flow, enabling proactive protection rather than reactive response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the control circuit quickly adjusts control signals to limit peak currents, then protection against excessive current flow is improved, but the circuit complexity increases due to additional comparators and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent surge protectionVSAvoidnumber of comparators and control blocks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The current compensator is designed as a multi-functional block that performs both current control (through the first comparator comparing input current with current reference signal) and peak current limiting (through the second comparator comparing input current with peak current reference signal). This universal design allows a single circuit block to handle multiple protection functions without requiring entirely separate control paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the current control function and peak current limit protection function into a single integrated current compensator circuit. Both comparators share common inputs (the input current signal) and work together to generate the control signal for the power switch, combining multiple protection mechanisms into one unified control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11482922B2Control circuits with peak current limit protection for switched mode power supplies
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 AES GLOBAL HLDG PTE LTD
  • US11482922B2 patent drawing
  • US11482922B2 patent drawing
  • US11482922B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic circuit comprises a first and second comparators and a first summer. The first comparator is configured to perform a first comparison to compare a first current reference signal with a signal representing an input current and configured to generate a first current error signal based on the first comparison. The second comparator is configured to perform a second comparison to compare a second current reference signal with the signal representing the input current and configured to generate a second current error signal based on the second comparison. The first summer is configured to adjust a first summer input error signal based on a second summer input error signal. The first summer input error signal is based on the first current error signal, and the second summer input error signal is based on the second current error signal.