SMA Actuator Haptic Feedback Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing haptic feedback systems provide limited customization and are not adaptable to varying user inputs, leading to a diminished user experience over time and a lack of differentiation in haptic sensations for different actions.

Innovation Solution

The use of shape memory alloy (SMA) actuator wires controlled by a processor to deliver customizable haptic feedback through a haptic profile system, which can adjust based on environmental factors and user input, allowing for varied haptic sensations for different actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional haptic feedback systems are used, then the structure is simple, but the customization capability is limited and the user experience diminishes over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic feedback system transitions from static, pre-programmed responses to dynamic, adaptive feedback that changes based on environmental factors and usage patterns. The processor continuously monitors conditions and adjusts haptic profile parameters in real-time, enabling the system to evolve and customize feedback without requiring complex manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies haptic feedback parameters (amplitude, frequency, duration, waveform) based on environmental factors such as temperature, device orientation, and usage context. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system achieves high adaptability without adding substantial hardware complexity, as the changes are implemented through software-controlled actuator parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed haptic profiles are used, then the device complexity is low, but the feedback quality varies for different actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback differentiationVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different haptic feedback characteristics are applied to different user actions and interface elements. Each button press, swipe, or interaction type receives a customized haptic profile tailored to its specific function, allowing the system to provide differentiated feedback quality without requiring entirely separate hardware systems for each action type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

A single haptic actuator system serves multiple functions by dynamically reconfiguring its output characteristics. The same physical actuator can produce diverse haptic sensations (clicks, vibrations, pulses, resistance) by varying drive parameters, eliminating the need for multiple specialized actuators while maintaining feedback differentiation across various user actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If environmental factors are not considered, then the system is simpler, but the haptic feedback quality degrades in varying conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback consistencyVSAvoidenvironmental adaptation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates environmental sensing and feedback loops that monitor temperature, device orientation, and usage patterns. This feedback information is continuously fed to the processor, which adjusts haptic profile parameters to compensate for environmental variations, ensuring consistent feedback quality across different operating conditions without requiring complex manual calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively adjusts haptic parameters based on predicted environmental conditions and usage contexts before the user interacts with the interface. By pre-adapting to environmental factors such as temperature changes or device orientation, the system maintains feedback consistency without requiring real-time complex computations during critical user interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables enhanced user experience by providing customizable and adaptive haptic feedback that varies with user input, improving the perception of different actions and maintaining feedback quality over time.

Implementation Method 1

at least one shape memory alloy (SMA) actuator wire for moving the moveable component to deliver haptic feedback

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShape memory alloy actuation: Shape Memory Alloy

Data Source

PatentUS12039858B2Haptic feedback generation
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 CAMBRIDGE MECHATRONICS
  • US12039858B2 patent drawing
  • US12039858B2 patent drawing
  • US12039858B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Broadly speaking, embodiments of the present techniques provide techniques for generating haptic feedback or haptic sensations, and in particular to techniques for outputting haptic feedback which varies depending on the input. The haptic feedback is delivered by a shape memory alloy (SMA) actuator that controls the movement of a component based on the required haptic feedback/sensation.