SMA-Reinforced Polymer Structure for Airless Tire Elasticity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies for combining metals like steel with rubber for reinforcement in applications such as tires rely on brass-coated chemical bonds, which are limited by the properties of steel and require pneumatic elements, lacking the advantages of shape memory alloys (SMAs) in elasticity and strength.

Innovation Solution

Combining SMAs with polymers to create structures that encapsulate SMA elements within polymers, forming structures with high elasticity and strength without pneumatic elements, using SMA structures like toroidal shapes encapsulated in polyurethane or other polymers, bonded to rubber treads for airless tires.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If steel is used for reinforcement in polymer structures, then strength is improved, but elasticity is limited and pneumatic elements are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereinforcement strengthVSAvoidelasticity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from conventional steel to shape memory alloys (SMAs), which possess unique properties including pseudoelasticity that allows for an order of magnitude greater recoverable strain than steel. This parameter change enables the reinforcement element to provide both high strength and superior elasticity without requiring pneumatic elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure by bonding SMAs to polymers, combining the high strength of SMAs with the elasticity and flexibility of polymer materials. This composite approach achieves both improved strength and enhanced elastic properties that neither material could provide alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If brass-coating and vulcanizing process is used to bond steel with rubber, then bonding strength is improved, but the process complexity and limitation to specific materials increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidbonding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the bonding mechanism from chemical bonding (brass-coating and vulcanizing) to mechanical bonding, where the SMA elements are mechanically attached to the polymer structure. This eliminates the need for complex chemical processes and sulfur compounds, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining strong bonds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the brass-coating intermediate layer from the bonding process, directly bonding SMAs to polymers without requiring the complex multi-step chemical bonding process involving sulfur compounds. This reduces process complexity and material limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If pneumatic elements are used in tire structures, then elasticity is improved, but durability in rugged terrains and fuel efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveelasticityVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes from pneumatic elasticity (air pressure) to solid-state pseudoelasticity provided by SMAs. This parameter change eliminates the need for air-filled chambers, resulting in puncture-proof structures with superior durability in rugged terrains while maintaining high elasticity through the SMA's inherent pseudoelastic properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates the pneumatic element (pressurized air) from the tire structure, replacing it with solid SMA elements that provide elastic recovery through their pseudoelastic properties. This removal of pneumatic components prevents punctures and improves reliability in harsh environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The SMA-polymer combination provides enhanced durability and lower rolling resistance, making them suitable for rugged terrains and environments without air, offering improved fuel efficiency compared to conventional pneumatic tires.

Implementation Method 1

SMAs have a pseudoelasticity that allows for an order of magnitude greater recoverable strain than steel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPseudoelasticity: Pseudoelasticity

Implementation Method 2

The SMA structure is encased in a polymer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEncapsulation: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS12466217B2Reinforcement of polymers with shape memory alloy elements
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 THE SMART TIRE CO INC
  • US12466217B2 patent drawing
  • US12466217B2 patent drawing
  • US12466217B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Shape memory alloy elements (“SMAs”) are bonded, encased, or encapsulated with one or more polymers to form an integrated component with unique elastic, pseudoelastic, and load-bearing properties.