Small Cell Grouping for Interference Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in managing interference between densely deployed small cells, which affects coverage, mobility, and load balancing, particularly in heterogeneous networks where small cells operate at different power levels, leading to inefficient resource allocation and increased complexity in handover and load balancing algorithms.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves grouping small cells into distinct power levels and deploying them in phases, with the first group operating at higher power levels for initial coverage and the second group at lower power levels for capacity enhancement, using frequency and time domain interference coordination techniques to minimize interference, and employing a same almost blank subframe pattern to support coexistence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If small cells are densely deployed to increase network capacity, then network capacity and coverage are improved, but interference between small cells increases and complicates network optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidnetwork optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments small cells into different groups based on their transmit power levels. High-power small cells form one group while low-power small cells form another group, allowing independent optimization and simplified interference management for each group rather than treating all small cells uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different power levels to different small cells based on their local deployment conditions and traffic demands. High-power small cells are deployed in areas requiring broader coverage while low-power small cells are used in areas with specific capacity needs, optimizing local network performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If small cells operate at different power levels to provide heterogeneous coverage, then coverage and capacity are optimized, but interference management and handover algorithms become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage optimizationVSAvoidhandover algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides small cells into distinct groups based on power levels, with high-power small cells in one group and low-power small cells in another. This segmentation simplifies handover algorithms by providing clear criteria for user equipment to select appropriate cells based on power level and signal strength, reducing the complexity of inter-group handovers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the power level parameter of small cells to create distinct operational groups. By controlling transmit power levels, the system creates predictable interference patterns and cell coverage areas, simplifying the logic required for handover decisions compared to allowing all cells to operate at arbitrary power levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If incremental deployment phases are used to reduce complexity, then deployment flexibility is improved, but deployment time and coordination requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment complexityVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary deployment of high-power small cells to establish initial network coverage and create a foundation for subsequent low-power small cell deployments. This preliminary action allows the network to become operational in phases, reducing overall deployment complexity while managing time through structured sequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic deployment phases where high-power small cells are deployed first, followed by low-power small cells in subsequent phases. This periodic approach to network expansion allows for systematic planning and resource allocation, balancing deployment complexity with time management through structured intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9713016B2Dense small cell deployment
Publication Date: 2017.07.18 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US9713016B2 patent drawing
  • US9713016B2 patent drawing
  • US9713016B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some aspects, the disclosure is directed to methods and systems for dense small cell deployment. In one or more embodiments, a plurality of small cells is grouped into a first group of small cells having a first power level and a second group of small cells having a second power level. In one or more embodiments, each power level in the first set of power levels is greater than each power level in the second set of power levels. In one or more embodiments, the small cells of the first group performs frequency domain inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC) between the small cells of the first group. In one or more embodiments, the small cells of the second group performs time domain ICIC with the small cells in the first group. In one or more embodiments, the small cells of the first group use a same almost blank subframe (ABS) pattern.