Small Cell Modulation Coding Scheme Selection Using Signal Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Telecommunication systems face efficiency issues due to excessive load on certain network portions, particularly during high data traffic, which can lead to suboptimal service quality.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining a modulation and coding scheme for small cells based on signal levels and channel quality indicators, allowing for improved traffic distribution and interference management by calculating a signal level metric and selecting appropriate modulation and coding schemes for transmissions associated with almost blank subframes from macro cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If macro cells transmit with high power to cover large areas, then coverage area is improved, but interference to small cells increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The macro cell employs Almost Blank Subframes (ABS) where transmission is periodically suspended or significantly reduced. During these ABS periods, the macro cell remains silent or transmits only essential signaling, allowing small cells to transmit without interference. This periodic action creates interference-free windows that improve small cell performance while maintaining overall network coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for small cell transmissions based on real-time channel conditions and interference levels. The eNodeB monitors channel quality indicators (CQI) and signal levels, then adaptively selects appropriate MCS parameters. This dynamic adaptation allows the small cell to optimize its transmission rate and reliability according to current macro cell interference patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If small cells transmit during macro cell active subframes, then spectrum utilization is improved, but service quality deteriorates due to interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectrum utilizationVSAvoidservice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different transmission strategies to different time resources. During ABS periods, small cells transmit with higher power and more aggressive MCS to exploit the interference-free condition. During non-ABS periods, small cells transmit at reduced power or with more robust modulation. This local differentiation of transmission quality across time resources optimizes both spectrum utilization and service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The eNodeB changes key transmission parameters including modulation order, coding rate, and transmit power based on the subframe type and channel conditions. For example, during ABS, the system may use 64-QAM with high coding rates for high throughput, while during non-ABS it switches to QPSK with lower coding rates for reliability. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction between spectrum efficiency and service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If modulation and coding scheme is optimized for high data rates, then throughput is improved, but robustness to interference decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidrobustness to interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The MCS selection is dynamically adjusted based on real-time channel quality indicators (CQI) and signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) measurements. The eNodeB monitors uplink CQI reports from user equipment and adapts the downlink MCS accordingly. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to achieve high throughput when channel conditions are favorable while maintaining robustness when interference levels increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where user equipment reports CQI and channel state information to the eNodeB. Based on this feedback, the eNodeB selects appropriate MCS parameters. Additionally, the system monitors block error rates and adjusts MCS to maintain target error rates. This feedback-driven adaptation resolves the throughput-robustness tradeoff by continuously optimizing MCS to current channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9621301B1Systems and methods for determining a modulation and coding scheme for a small cell
Publication Date: 2017.04.11 SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
  • US9621301B1 patent drawing
  • US9621301B1 patent drawing
  • US9621301B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for determining a modulation and coding scheme for a small cell. A small cell may receive a first signal level for a first signal received at a wireless device and a second signal level for a second signal received at the wireless device, wherein the received first signal is from the small cell and the received second signal is from a macro cell. The small cell may also receive a channel quality indicator from the wireless device that indicates a channel quality for communications between the wireless device and the small cell. A signal level metric may be calculated based on the first signal level, the second signal level, and the received channel quality indicator. A modulation and coding scheme for a transmission from the small call may be determined, wherein the transmission is associated with an almost blank subframe transmission from the macro cell.