Small Diameter Furnace Tubes for Ethane Cracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ethane cracking systems with larger diameter radiant tubes and low coil outlet pressures result in high capital and process costs due to low gas density and high volumetric flowrates, and increased coking rates, which are exacerbated by the need for larger and more costly compressors and equipment for processing the effluent.

Innovation Solution

Operating ethane steam cracking at elevated coil inlet and outlet pressures in small diameter furnace coils, with pressures ranging from 200 kPa-g to 520 kPa-g, while maintaining a coking rate comparable to low pressure operations by reducing temperatures and using resistant materials, such as nickel-chromium alloys with alumina barrier layers, to mitigate coke formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If larger diameter radiant tubes are used with low coil outlet pressures, then conventional ethane cracking can be performed, but capital and process costs increase due to low gas density and high volumetric flowrates requiring larger compressors and equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconventional cracking operationVSAvoidgas density
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating pressure parameter from conventional low pressure (≤150 kPa-g outlet) to elevated pressure (200-520 kPa-g outlet), which increases gas density and reduces volumetric flowrate, thereby reducing compressor size and capital costs while maintaining cracking effectiveness through small diameter tubes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If larger diameter radiant tubes are used with low coil outlet pressures, then conventional cracking can operate, but coking rates increase requiring more frequent maintenance and larger equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconventional cracking operationVSAvoidcoking rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the tube diameter parameter from conventional large diameter (7-16 cm) to small diameter (≤6.0 cm, preferably 2.0-5.0 cm), which reduces the surface area available for coke formation and allows operation at elevated pressures that reduce coking rates through improved heat transfer and reduced residence time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structures with coke-resistant inner linings or coatings in the small diameter radiant tubes, combining base tube material with protective layers that resist coke adhesion and facilitate easier coke removal, thereby reducing maintenance frequency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If elevated coil outlet pressures (200-520 kPa-g) are used in small diameter coils, then gas density increases and equipment size decreases, but coking rates may increase without temperature reduction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas densityVSAvoidcoking rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simultaneously changes multiple parameters: reduces tube diameter to ≤6.0 cm and increases outlet pressure to 200-520 kPa-g, which together enable operation at elevated temperatures without increased coking because the small diameter provides superior heat transfer that prevents localized hot spots where coke forms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the number of stages and size of downstream equipment, decreases energy requirements, and maintains once-through conversion and selectivity rates for ethylene production, thereby lowering capital and operating costs while minimizing coking issues.

Implementation Method 1

using resistant materials, such as nickel-chromium alloys with alumina barrier layers, to mitigate coke formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaterial resistance:

Implementation Method 2

nickel-chromium alloys with alumina barrier layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProtective coating: Coatings

Implementation Method 3

steam cracking of ethane to form ethylene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 4

Operating ethane steam cracking at elevated coil inlet and outlet pressures in small diameter furnace coils, with pressures ranging from 200 kPa-g to 520 kPa-g

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure compression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS12024685B2High pressure ethane cracking with small diameter furnace tubes
Publication Date: 2024.07.02 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • US12024685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for performing ethane steam cracking at elevated coil inlet pressures and/or elevated coil outlet pressures in small diameter furnace coils. Instead of performing steam cracking of ethane at a coil outlet pressure of ˜22 psig or less (˜150 kPa-g or less), the steam cracking of ethane can be performed in small diameter furnace coils at a coil outlet pressure of 30 psig to 75 psig (˜200 kPa-g to ˜520 kPa-g), or 40 psig to 75 psig (˜270 kPa-g to ˜520 kPa-g). In order to achieve such higher coil outlet pressures, a correspondingly higher coil inlet pressure can also be used, such as a pressure of 45 psig (˜310 kPa-g) or more, or 50 psig (˜340 kPa-g) or more.