Smart Alert Delivery Using Sensor State Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mobile device alert systems often fail to effectively renotify users, as secondary alerts are not guaranteed to capture the user's attention, especially when the device is inaccessible, leading to missed notifications.

Innovation Solution

Implementing smart heuristics that utilize sensors to determine opportune moments for sending alerts, suppressing or dismissing alerts based on device state changes, such as motion, light, and noise sensors, to ensure alerts are delivered when the user is likely to notice them.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a second alert is sent at a fixed time later, then the alert delivery time is extended, but the alert may still be missed if the device is inaccessible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert delivery reliabilityVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a fixed-time alert schedule to a dynamic alert delivery system that adapts to real-time device state changes. The system continuously monitors sensor data (motion, light, noise) and adjusts alert delivery timing based on detected state transitions, ensuring alerts are delivered when the device is accessible to the user rather than following a rigid timetable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using sensor measurements to monitor device state and adjust alert delivery accordingly. The system receives feedback from sensors about device accessibility, processes this information through a state engine, and modifies alert delivery timing based on this feedback, creating a closed-loop system that improves reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If sensor measurements are continuously monitored, then the accuracy of device state detection is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice state detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by implementing continuous monitoring at discrete time intervals rather than truly continuous monitoring. The system periodically samples sensor data at predetermined intervals, which maintains adequate measurement precision for detecting state changes while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by monitoring only the necessary sensor data required for state detection rather than all possible sensor outputs. The system selectively processes sensor measurements that are relevant to determining device accessibility, reducing computational energy consumption while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If multiple sensors are used to determine device state, then the reliability of accessibility determination is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility determination reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using a multi-functional state engine that handles multiple tasks: processing sensor data from various sensors, determining device state, detecting state transitions, and controlling alert delivery. This centralized approach consolidates complexity into a single manageable component rather than requiring separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functionality of multiple sensors and processing systems into a unified state detection and alert delivery system. By combining sensor inputs, state determination, and alert control in an integrated architecture, the system manages the complexity of multiple sensors through cohesive design rather than treating them as separate complex subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10609207B2Sending smart alerts on a device at opportune moments using sensors
Publication Date: 2020.03.31 APPLE INC
  • US10609207B2 patent drawing
  • US10609207B2 patent drawing
  • US10609207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Measurements can be obtained from sensors to determine a state of a device. The state can be used to determine whether to provide an alert. For example, after a first alert is provided, it can be determined that the device is not accessible to the user based on the determined state, and a second alert can be suppressed at a specified time after providing the first alert. The sensor measurements can be monitored after suppressing the second alert, and a state engine can detect a change in a state based on subsequent sensor measurements. If the state change indicates that the device is accessible to the user the second alert can be provided to the user. Alerts can be dismissed based on a change in state. A first device can coordinate alerts sent to or to be provided by a second device by suppressing or dismissing such alerts.