Smart Bridge for NAND Flash Memory Core

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional NAND flash memory devices have limited storage capacity and performance due to the occupation of space by periphery circuitry on the same die as the memory core, which restricts the design of flash data storage elements and increases intercell/interwordline interference.

Innovation Solution

Implementing periphery circuitry, such as data latches, state machines, and ECC engines, on a separate smart bridge device using CMOS technology rather than NAND flash technology, allowing for increased storage capacity and ECC capability by relocating these components away from the memory core die.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If periphery circuitry is implemented on the same die as the memory core, then device integration is improved, but storage capacity is reduced due to space occupation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integrationVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the memory device into separate functional components: the memory core die and a peripheral die. The peripheral die houses all periphery circuitry (charge pumps, state machines, row decoders, column decoders, ECC engines) separately from the memory core, allowing each die to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall device integration through packaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts periphery circuitry from the memory core die and relocates it to a separate peripheral die. This extraction frees up valuable die area on the memory core for additional flash data storage elements, directly increasing storage capacity while maintaining all necessary peripheral functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If periphery circuitry is implemented on the same die as the memory core, then device integration is improved, but intercell interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integrationVSAvoidintercell interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the device into separate memory core and peripheral circuitry dies, the patent physically isolates sources of electrical interference and noise generation from the sensitive memory storage elements. This spatial separation reduces intercell and interwordline interference while maintaining functional integration through the peripheral die interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If periphery circuitry is implemented on the same die as the memory core, then device integration is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integrationVSAvoidmanufacturing precision requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the device into two separately manufacturable dies with different optimal process requirements. The memory core die can be manufactured using standard NAND flash processes, while the peripheral die can be manufactured using CMOS processes optimized for digital logic and analog circuitry. This segmentation relaxes overall manufacturing precision requirements by allowing each die to be optimized for its specific process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the manufacturing parameters and process technology used for different parts of the device. The peripheral die uses CMOS technology with different process parameters than the NAND flash memory core, allowing each component to be manufactured under optimal conditions rather than forcing a single process to meet all requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If ECC engines are implemented on the memory controller, then system architecture is simplified, but ECC capability is reduced in multi-core implementations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem architectureVSAvoidECC capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the ECC engine functionality into the peripheral die that is directly coupled to each memory core. This integration allows multiple independent ECC engines to operate concurrently with multiple memory cores, providing enhanced error correction capability for each core while maintaining a relatively simple overall system architecture through the unified peripheral die design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9406346B2Smart bridge for memory core
Publication Date: 2016.08.02 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US9406346B2 patent drawing
  • US9406346B2 patent drawing
  • US9406346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes a first semiconductor device including a NAND flash memory core. The apparatus also includes a second semiconductor device including periphery circuitry associated with the NAND flash memory core.