Smart Buoyancy Control for Automated Aquatic Pod Farming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The United States faces challenges in meeting increasing seafood demand due to limited aquaculture production capacity and reliance on imported seafood from countries with fewer environmental regulations, necessitating improved productivity and access to ocean farming.

Innovation Solution

An aquaculture system utilizing smart buoyancy components, including a control device and remote device, to automate farming tasks such as herding, feeding, cleaning, and harvesting aquatic organisms by controlling the buoyancy of aquatic structures, reducing labor costs and enhancing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional aquaculture methods are used, then labor costs are high and productivity is limited, but automation introduces device complexity and initial investment costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaquaculture production capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aquatic structure performs farming tasks autonomously by utilizing environmental resources. The structure uses water currents for transport, sunlight for algae growth, and natural wave action for mixing and aeration, eliminating the need for complex mechanical systems, motors, or external power sources while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical farming equipment (motors, pumps, propellers) with a passive buoyant structure that operates through physical principles. The structure uses buoyancy for vertical movement, water currents for horizontal transport, and wave energy for internal mixing, substituting complex mechanical systems with simpler physics-based operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If more aquatic structures are deployed to increase production, then aquaculture output increases, but water usage and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseafood productionVSAvoidwater consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The structure uses hydraulic principles to circulate water through internal channels and chambers. Water flows through the structure for aeration, feeding, and waste removal, then returns to the environment, creating a closed-loop system that minimizes water loss while supporting high-density aquaculture production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The aquatic structure employs flexible, permeable materials that allow water to pass through while containing the aquatic organisms. The semi-permeable membranes enable selective water flow and gas exchange, maintaining internal water quality without requiring large volumes of fresh water

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Ease of operation

If manual farming tasks are performed, then crop quality can be monitored, but labor costs increase and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefarming task automationVSAvoidcrop quality monitoring capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The structure incorporates sensors that continuously monitor water quality parameters (temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, turbidity) and organism health indicators. This data is fed back to operators, enabling real-time adjustments to farming practices and maintaining crop quality without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual inspection and monitoring tasks are replaced with automated sensing systems. The structure uses optical sensors, conductivity probes, and other electronic detectors to continuously assess crop quality, substituting human labor with automated detection while preserving or enhancing monitoring accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system increases aquaculture productivity by minimizing human intervention, optimizing farming tasks, and improving crop quality through data-driven farming models, enabling the United States to meet growing seafood demands sustainably.

Implementation Method 1

The buoyancy system may include a buoyancy chamber and a controller configured to control an amount of air in the buoyancy chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS20250008934A1Smart buoyancy in aquaculture
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 MARINE DEPTH CONTROL ENGINEERING LLC
  • US20250008934A1 patent drawing
  • US20250008934A1 patent drawing
  • US20250008934A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aquaculture system can include an aquafarm with one or more aquatic pods of aquatic organisms and a remote device to manage the aquafarm. An aquatic pod may be associated with an aquatic structure with a buoyancy system and a control device to automatically perform daily farming functions. The aquatic structure may include an enclosure to hold the aquatic organisms. The control device may be configured to use a smart buoyancy assistant to control the buoyancy system and to determine the farming task to perform in response to environmental stimuli. The remote device can receive data representing crop metrics, harvest results, and sensor data. The remote device can aggregate data from multiple aquatic pods and correlate the data to generate aquaculture models to improve the harvest results. The remote device can generate overview and maintenance reports for the aquafarm.