Smart Buoyancy Compensation Devices for Autonomous Depth Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aquatic structures lack efficient and automated buoyancy control systems, requiring manual or operator-dependent methods to adjust buoyancy, which limits their ability to autonomously or remotely manage depth and position in aquatic environments.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Smart Buoyancy Compensation Devices (SBCDs) that utilize data analytics and artificial intelligence to automatically control buoyancy by adjusting gas volume in bladders through electrically controlled valves, with sensors monitoring depth, pressure, and other conditions to maintain precise depth control and hover capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual buoyancy control methods are used in aquatic structures, then device complexity is reduced, but automation extent and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuoyancy control automationVSAvoidbuoyancy control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The buoyancy control system automatically monitors and adjusts buoyancy without requiring manual intervention. The controller receives signals from sensors detecting depth, pressure, and other conditions, then automatically operates valves to adjust gas volume in bladders, enabling the system to self-regulate buoyancy based on environmental conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical buoyancy adjustment with an automated control system that uses electronic sensors, controllers, and electrically actuated valves. This substitution of mechanical manual operation with automated electromechanical systems enables remote and autonomous buoyancy control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If automated buoyancy control with multiple sensors and valves is implemented, then depth control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth measurement precisionVSAvoidsensor and valve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple sensors (depth, pressure, and other condition sensors) and electrically controlled valves into a unified automated buoyancy control system. This multi-functional integration allows a single controller to manage all sensing and actuation functions, improving depth control precision while managing system complexity through centralized control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If manual buoyancy adjustment is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but productivity and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidmanual operation requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs buoyancy control operations autonomously by monitoring environmental conditions through sensors and automatically adjusting gas volume in bladders through electrically controlled valves, eliminating the need for manual operator intervention and significantly improving operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously receives feedback from sensors monitoring depth, pressure, and other conditions, then automatically adjusts buoyancy by controlling valve operation to maintain desired depth settings, enabling rapid and efficient response to changing environmental conditions without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables autonomous and remote control of aquatic structures and objects, reducing the need for manual intervention, optimizing depth adjustments, and enhancing operational efficiency in various aquatic applications such as aquaculture, salvage operations, and fishing, by maintaining precise buoyancy and depth settings.

Implementation Method 1

A buoyancy compensator, buoyancy control device, BC, BCD, stabilizer, or the like, is typically a piece of diving equipment with an inflatable bladder worn by divers to establish neutral buoyancy underwater and positive buoyancy on the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectArchimedes' principle (Buoyancy): Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

gas is added to a bladder or equivalent structure via an electrically controlled gas valve, and vented by the simultaneous operation of at least one of a plurality of typically pneumatically activated vent valves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10889355B2Smart buoyancy compensation devices
Publication Date: 2021.01.12 MARINE DEPTH CONTROL ENGINEERING LLC
  • US10889355B2 patent drawing
  • US10889355B2 patent drawing
  • US10889355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aquatic structures with adjustable buoyancy constructed in part with a vent valve for a buoyancy control device suitable for divers, where the vent valve may be opened by any combination of over-pressure, manual pressure relief or a powered means, where a force to a valve plug is applied by means of a spring that is constrained to prevent entirely lateral and angular movement but in which movement of the plug in the axis of the seat is unconstrained.