Smart Card Current Source Regulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

SIM cards often exceed permissible current consumption limits due to varying operational parameters, leading to inefficiencies and performance reductions, as existing solutions require complex programming and result in delayed corrections and overshoots.

Innovation Solution

A smart card with a current source configured to provide a predefined current intensity to its components, utilizing a series regulator and current mirror to maintain a constant supply current, and a regulator to control voltage and clock signals, ensuring reliable operation within specified limits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If programming measures are used to limit current consumption (e.g., introducing NOP operations or reducing system frequency), then current consumption is kept below permitted limits, but device complexity increases and performance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent consumptionVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses its own current consumption measurements to automatically control the clock signal, creating a self-regulating mechanism that limits current without external programming intervention. The control unit continuously monitors current draw and adjusts clocking accordingly, making the system self-sufficient in managing its power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A feedback loop is established where the control unit monitors the actual current consumption and uses this information to adjust the clock signal frequency or suppression, ensuring current limits are maintained while optimizing performance. This closed-loop control eliminates the need for pre-programmed current management sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If an integrated automatism with control loop is used to suppress system clock when current exceeds threshold, then current limits are enforced, but correction delays occur due to synchronization requirements and dead time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent limit enforcementVSAvoidcorrection delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit proactively manages clock suppression before current limits are severely exceeded by continuously monitoring current consumption and anticipating threshold violations. This preliminary action allows the system to adjust clocking in advance, reducing the need for corrective delays when limits are approached.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the clock signal based on real-time current conditions, allowing flexible response times that adapt to varying operational states. This dynamic control enables faster response compared to fixed synchronization intervals, reducing correction delays while maintaining current limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a long time constant is used in the control loop, then mean current value is well controlled, but severe load changes are corrected with delay and specification adherence is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemean current controlVSAvoidresponse to load changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts its response characteristics based on operational conditions, allowing it to maintain stable mean current control during normal operation while responding more quickly to severe load changes. This dynamic behavior resolves the trade-off between stability and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (such as clock frequency suppression levels) in response to varying load conditions, allowing it to maintain reliable current control under normal conditions while adapting to handle severe load changes more effectively, improving both reliability and productivity across different operating states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If current consumption is allowed to exceed limits temporarily, then performance is maintained, but specification adherence is violated and efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidcurrent limit adherence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors current consumption and uses this feedback to adjust clock signal suppression in real-time, ensuring current limits are maintained without significantly impacting performance. This allows the system to operate efficiently within specifications by making dynamic adjustments based on actual power draw.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial clock suppression only when necessary to maintain current limits, rather than continuously suppressing clocks. This selective application of current management allows performance to be maintained as much as possible while still adhering to current specifications during critical periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9508035B2Smart card
Publication Date: 2016.11.29 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US9508035B2 patent drawing
  • US9508035B2 patent drawing
  • US9508035B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with various embodiments, a smart card including one or more components to be supplied and a current source, which is configured to provide a supply current with a predefined current intensity to the one or more components to be supplied, is described.