Smart Card Asymmetric Transparent Edge Resists Corner Delamination
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing smart cards with transparent frames face challenges in maintaining impact resistance when increasing the transparent area, particularly in corners, leading to delamination and failure in compliance with standards like MasterCard CQM 2016 TM-417 and ANSI 322 2015 § 5.19, 6.1, 6.6.
Innovation Solution
A security document with a modified transparent frame structure featuring an asymmetrical curved boundary line between a cutout in the opaque coupon and a bulging transparent corner, enhancing the corner's resistance to impact tests while allowing for larger transparent areas.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If the transparent frame area is increased to accommodate security motifs, then the card's security and visual differentiation are improved, but the card's impact resistance deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies asymmetry by creating a bulge in only one corner of the transparent frame rather than uniformly increasing transparency across all corners. This asymmetric design allows the security motif to be placed in a single corner while maintaining structural integrity in other areas. The bulge is positioned to maximize security functionality while minimizing impact on overall card strength.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements local quality by concentrating the transparent frame enhancement in a specific corner region where the security motif is required, rather than uniformly increasing transparency across the entire frame. This localized approach allows the security functionality to be improved precisely where needed while preserving the impact resistance of the overall card structure.
2Adaptability or versatility
If the transparent frame area is increased, then the card's visual differentiation and anti-counterfeiting capability are improved, but the card's physical resistance to impact tests deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The asymmetric corner bulge design enables visual differentiation and anti-counterfeiting features to be implemented in a localized manner. The irregular shape of the bulge creates unique visual characteristics that enhance security while the asymmetric distribution of material maintains structural balance and resistance to impact forces.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments the transparent frame modification into a discrete corner bulge rather than a uniform expansion. This segmentation allows the security-enhancing transparent area to be separated from the structural core of the card, enabling visual differentiation without compromising the overall physical resistance of the card body.
3Area of stationary object
If the corner transparent area is enlarged, then the card's security motif accommodation capability is improved, but the card's compliance with impact test standards deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The asymmetric design of the corner bulge with its irregular boundary line creates a unique geometric profile that accommodates security motifs while maintaining structural integrity. The non-uniform shape distributes stress differently compared to a symmetric expansion, helping the card meet impact test requirements despite the increased transparent area.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs curvature in the boundary line of the corner bulge, using rounded transitions instead of sharp angles. This curvature helps distribute impact forces more evenly across the modified corner region, preventing stress concentration that would lead to delamination and maintaining compliance with impact test standards.
4Reliability
If the transparent frame is modified to have larger corner areas, then the card's security features are enhanced, but the card's resistance to delamination deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The asymmetric corner bulge design creates an irregular interface between the transparent frame and the underlying structure. This asymmetric geometry, with its curved boundary line, increases the surface area for adhesion in a non-uniform pattern that enhances security features while maintaining delamination resistance through distributed bonding areas.
Solution Approach 2:
The curved boundary line of the corner bulge creates smooth transitions and rounded interfaces between different card layers. This curvature eliminates sharp corners that would be stress concentration points, thereby preventing delamination while still providing the increased transparent area needed for security features.
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3~4
Figure 5~6
AI summary
The invention is directed to a security document comprising a coupon (30) in the form of a multi-layered complex consisting mainly of an opaque zone and surrounded by a transparent border (4), the security document being characterised in that the coupon (30) comprises a die-cut (21) in at least one of the corners thereof, in that the transparent border (4) comprises, at said die-cut (21), a broadened zone (22) matching said die-cut (21), and in that the boundary (23) between said die-cut (21) and said broadened zone (22) has a curved shape that is dissymmetric relative to the bisector (B) of the angle of the corner corresponding to the broadened zone (22) of the transparent border (4).