Smart City Shutdown Planning for Preemptive Hazard Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smart cities face challenges in managing and preemptively shutting down components to mitigate hazards due to the increasing number of IoT devices, which can pose safety and efficiency risks without effective predictive and responsive systems.

Innovation Solution

The Emergency and Hazards Containment Advisory System (EHCAS) is implemented, comprising a core module, hazards analytics module, and shutdown plan creation module, which collects data, detects hazards, and generates or executes predefined or new shutdown plans to safely shut down affected components, ensuring minimal disruption to the city's operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If preemptive shutdown of components is implemented to mitigate hazards, then safety of smart city operations is improved, but operational disruption and loss of productivity occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of smart city operationsVSAvoidoperational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary hazard detection and assessment before hazards materialize into critical threats. By analyzing data from IoT devices, environmental sensors, and operational systems, the system identifies potential hazards early and initiates preemptive shutdowns before they can cause significant damage or safety incidents, thus protecting operations while minimizing disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors operational data, hazard indicators, and system status through feedback loops from IoT devices and sensors. This real-time feedback enables dynamic adjustment of shutdown decisions, allowing the system to shut down only when necessary and to resume operations promptly when hazards are mitigated, thereby maintaining safety while preserving operational continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a comprehensive hazard detection and response system is deployed across multiple entities, then hazard mitigation capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard mitigation capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a unified multi-functional platform that handles hazard detection, data collection, analysis, decision-making, and coordinated shutdown across multiple entities. This universal system architecture consolidates what could be numerous separate systems into a single integrated platform, reducing overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive hazard mitigation capabilities across smart city infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments hazard detection and response by entity type (power utilities, water treatment facilities, transportation systems, etc.) while maintaining centralized coordination. Each entity has specialized sensors and response protocols tailored to its specific hazards, but all are managed through a common decision-making framework, allowing modular deployment that reduces implementation complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If real-time data collection from multiple IoT devices is performed, then hazard detection accuracy is improved, but data processing requirements and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects data from all available IoT devices and sensors to ensure complete hazard detection coverage, but processes and acts on only the critical subset of data that directly indicates hazard conditions. This selective processing approach maintains high detection accuracy by considering all data sources while minimizing energy consumption by focusing computational resources on hazard-relevant information rather than processing all collected data equally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12072677B2System and method for preemptive shutdown of utilities, facilities or systems in smart cities
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US12072677B2 patent drawing
  • US12072677B2 patent drawing
  • US12072677B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for a preemptive and graceful shutdown of utilities, facilities or systems in smart cities includes detecting a hazard at external entities based on collected information, determining whether a predefined shutdown plan for the detected hazard exists, generating a new shutdown plan, based on predefined criteria, for the detected hazard, and shutting down the at least one component of the external entities based on the new shutdown plan or the predefined shutdown plan.