Smart Commenting Software Automates Document Review

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current document commenting software is inefficient and costly due to the manual preparation of similar comments for repetitive document provisions, leading to time consumption, potential oversight, and internal conflicts within organizations.

Innovation Solution

A system that facilitates efficient and consistent comment preparation by comparing documents against a database of stored phrases and comments, allowing for automatic generation, organization, and transmission of comments, with features like learning comments, database association, retrieval, and formatting options.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If comments are prepared manually for each document provision, then comments can be customized to specific needs, but time consumption and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomment preparation efficiencyVSAvoidtime for preparing comments
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-preparing and storing standardized comments in a database before they are needed. When a new document is processed, the system retrieves pre-prepared comments that match document provisions, eliminating the need to manually create these comments from scratch each time. This resolves the contradiction by having comments ready in advance, significantly reducing preparation time while maintaining quality through selective retrieval and customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If standardized comments are used across similar documents, then consistency is improved, but the ability to address specific document nuances is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomment consistencyVSAvoidcomment customization flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by allowing different levels of comment customization based on specific needs. The comment retrieval process presents matched comments for selective acceptance or modification, enabling users to apply standardized comments where appropriate and customize them where document-specific nuances require attention. This resolves the contradiction by making comments locally adaptable rather than uniformly standardized or entirely custom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by making the comment preparation process flexible and adaptive rather than static. The system dynamically retrieves comments based on document content analysis, allows users to review and modify retrieved comments, and updates the database with new or modified comments for future use. This dynamic approach maintains consistency through standardized templates while adapting to specific document requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If multiple collaborators prepare comments independently, then parallel work is enabled, but conflicting positions and coordination issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration efficiencyVSAvoidcoordination and consistency information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by providing real-time visibility of comments prepared by other collaborators through the shared database. When one collaborator retrieves or creates a comment, it becomes available to others working on related documents. This feedback mechanism prevents duplicate work, identifies conflicting positions early, and enables coordination without requiring constant communication, thus maintaining productivity while preventing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies universality by creating a centralized comment database that serves multiple collaborators simultaneously. The same database of standardized comments and prepared remarks is universally accessible to all team members, ensuring everyone works from the same foundation while maintaining individual document-specific customizations. This universal resource eliminates coordination conflicts and ensures consistency across collaborative efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If comprehensive comments are prepared for all document provisions, then thorough review is achieved, but many comments are overlooked due to quantity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomment completenessVSAvoidtime to review and process comments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and separates high-priority comment issues from the overall comment set by retrieving and presenting them in a structured format. The comment retrieval process identifies and extracts the most relevant comments based on document provisions, allowing users to focus on critical issues first. This extraction approach ensures comprehensive coverage while preventing oversight by organizing comments in a manageable, prioritized sequence rather than presenting them all at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10216733B2Smart commenting software
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 HOMER GREGG S
  • US10216733B2 patent drawing
  • US10216733B2 patent drawing
  • US10216733B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system facilitates the efficient and consistent preparation of comments to documents prepared by others by comparing each such document against phrases and their associated comments stored in one or more local, remote, or removable databases. The system can also facilitate the efficient communication of comments to a given document by organizing such comments in a format suitable for transmission to the intended recipients.