Smart Contract Audit Certificates for Deployed Code Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blockchain networks face challenges in effectively maintaining certification authority authorization and efficiently verifying and reissuing certificates for smart contracts, particularly in ensuring that deployed smart contracts match their audited copies and addressing security risks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a blockchain cybersecurity platform with tiered certificate authority systems that authorize root authority entities to manage certificate authorities, issue and revoke certificates, and perform on-chain verification to ensure smart contracts are securely deployed and upgraded, using on-chain audit certificates to verify the integrity of smart contracts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional certificate authority system is used for smart contract verification, then certificate issuance and verification processes become centralized and vulnerable to security risks, but implementing a decentralized blockchain-based certificate system increases system complexity and requires multiple root authority entities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of certificate issuanceVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The certificate authority system is segmented into multiple root authority entities (first root authority entity, second root authority entity, etc.), each capable of independently authorizing and managing certificate authorities. This segmentation distributes the security responsibilities and eliminates single-point failures while maintaining systematic control through hierarchical authorization structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If certificate authorities are authorized to issue certificates for smart contracts, then verification efficiency improves, but maintaining authorization parameters and revoking unauthorized certificates becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecertificate verification efficiencyVSAvoidauthorization management ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous monitoring of certificate authority authorization parameters through feedback mechanisms. Root authority entities receive notifications and can detect when authorization parameters are not satisfied, enabling timely revocation of unauthorized certificates. The feedback loop ensures maintaining authorization integrity without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If smart contracts are deployed on blockchain networks, then transparency and immutability are achieved, but verifying that deployed contracts match audited copies becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmutability of smart contractsVSAvoidverification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates cryptographic copies (hashes) of smart contract code at different stages (audited version, deployed version). These cryptographic copies serve as verifiable identifiers that can be compared without exposing the actual contract code. The copying mechanism enables efficient verification while preserving the immutability and transparency of blockchain-deployed contracts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If multiple root authority entities are introduced to manage certificate authorities, then system reliability and security are enhanced, but the complexity of managing inter-authority relationships increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidauthority relationship complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-root authority system is segmented into independent, hierarchically organized entities. Each root authority entity manages its own set of certificate authorities autonomously, creating isolated security domains. This segmentation reduces the complexity of inter-authority relationships by establishing clear boundaries and independent management zones while enhancing overall system reliability through redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260081913A1Post-Audit Certificate Issuance for Deployed Blockchain Smart Contracts on Blockchain Cybersecurity Platforms
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 HALBORN INC
  • US20260081913A1 patent drawing
  • US20260081913A1 patent drawing
  • US20260081913A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a method includes receiving a first copy of source code associated with a smart contract in a specified development environment associated with the smart contract, wherein the certificate authority is authorized to audit the smart contract, generating an audit report for the smart contract based on the first copy of source code and security criteria, receiving an indication that the smart contract was deployed on a first blockchain network by the certificate authority, determining that the smart contract deployed on the first blockchain network does not match the first copy of source code, and transmitting a notification that a certificate was not issued by the certificate authority for the smart contract deployed on the first blockchain network to an entity associated with the smart contract.