Smart Contract Code Graph Patching for Blockchain Vulnerabilities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smart contracts on blockchain networks are susceptible to programming mistakes and security vulnerabilities such as reentrancy attacks, integer bugs, and other issues, which can lead to significant financial losses and are difficult to remediate due to the immutable nature of the blockchain.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that translates smart contract source code into an abstract syntax tree model, generates a code property graph, enriches it with inferable information, detects vulnerabilities, and applies patches directly to the source code to remediate issues like reentrancy and integer overflows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If smart contracts are deployed on blockchain networks, then autonomous agents can manage cryptocurrency and execute transactions, but programming mistakes and security vulnerabilities make them susceptible to attacks and financial losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesmart contract functionalityVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs static analysis of smart contract source code before deployment to identify security vulnerabilities and programming mistakes. By analyzing the code in advance and generating vulnerability reports, the system enables developers to fix issues before the contract is deployed to the blockchain, preventing potential attacks and financial losses while maintaining the autonomous functionality of smart contracts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If the blockchain is immutable, then data can be stored in a decentralized and secure way, but vulnerabilities in smart contracts cannot be remediated after deployment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblockchain immutabilityVSAvoidvulnerability remediation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes smart contract source code before deployment to identify vulnerabilities, allowing developers to remediate issues in advance. This preliminary analysis approach enables vulnerability repair without compromising the immutability of the blockchain, as fixes are applied to the code before it is permanently deployed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system works with copies of the smart contract source code to perform static analysis and generate vulnerability reports. By analyzing code copies rather than the actual deployed contracts, the system enables vulnerability identification and remediation guidance without altering the immutable blockchain data, allowing developers to create patched versions of the contracts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If manual code review is performed, then security can be improved, but development time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs static analysis of smart contract source code to identify security vulnerabilities, generating comprehensive vulnerability reports without requiring manual code review. This automated self-service approach maintains high security standards while significantly reducing the time and complexity associated with manual analysis, allowing developers to quickly receive feedback and fix vulnerabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical code review processes with automated computer-based static analysis. By using computational methods to analyze source code, identify vulnerability patterns, and generate reports, the system eliminates the time-consuming manual inspection process while maintaining thorough security checking capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If static analysis is performed, then vulnerabilities can be detected before deployment, but false positives and false negatives reduce detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detectionVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates detailed vulnerability reports that provide feedback to developers about detected issues, including vulnerability descriptions, locations in the code, and remediation guidance. This feedback mechanism enables developers to verify detected vulnerabilities and correct false positives or negatives, improving overall detection accuracy through iterative refinement and developer input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12536010B2Method and system for supporting smart contracts in a blockchain network
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 NEC CORP
  • US12536010B2 patent drawing
  • US12536010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for supporting smart contracts in a blockchain network is provided. The method includes translating a source code of a smart contract into an abstract syntax tree model and generating a code property graph based on the abstract syntax tree model. The method further includes performing an enrichment phase, a vulnerability detection phase, and a vulnerability patching phase. In the enrichment phase, the code property graph is enriched with information that is obtained from the abstract syntax tree model. In the vulnerability detection phase, the code property graph is analyzed for predetermined vulnerability patterns in order to detect predetermined vulnerabilities. In the vulnerability patching phase, one or more patches are applied in order to fix the predetermined vulnerabilities. In some examples, the method can perform improved decision-making by optimizing the process for efficiently hardening smart contracts such that vulnerabilities within the contract can be remedied and eliminated.