Smart Contract Graph Forensics for Coordinated Fraud

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blockchain networks face challenges in organizing and tracking updates to multi-party smart contracts, which are difficult to upgrade due to immutability, and are vulnerable to fraudulent transactions and sophisticated fraud schemes orchestrated across collaborating contracts, with current fraud detection methods failing to identify such coordinated illicit activities effectively.

Innovation Solution

The Value Token Transfer Protocol (VTTP) enables intra- and inter-chain value transfers and fraud detection by modeling inter-contract relationships as computational graphs, applying analytic techniques to identify coordinated fraud, and automating responses to mitigate risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If smart contracts are made immutable to ensure security and trustlessness, then reliability is improved, but adaptability deteriorates making upgrades difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontract securityVSAvoidcontract upgradeability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the smart contract system into multiple versions and instances. Instead of modifying a single immutable contract, the system creates separate contract versions (e.g., contract v1, contract v2) that can coexist. This allows the system to maintain the immutability of original contracts while enabling upgrades through deployment of new contract instances, resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by embedding version identifiers and upgrade metadata into the contract deployment process from the beginning. The system pre-structures contracts with versioning information and upgrade pathways, allowing future updates without compromising the immutability of the original contract code. This preliminary structuring enables seamless transitions while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If traditional fraud detection methods are used to identify fraudulent transactions, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates failing to detect coordinated fraud schemes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection simplicityVSAvoidfraud detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary forensic analysis system that sits between the blockchain network and the users. This intermediary automatically performs graph-based analysis of contract relationships and transaction patterns, translating complex inter-contract interactions into detectable fraud indicators. The intermediary handles the computational complexity of detecting coordinated fraud schemes while presenting simple fraud detection capabilities to users, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive tracking of inter-contract relationships is implemented to detect fraud, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual or simple rule-based fraud detection mechanisms with automated graph computation systems. The system uses computational graph theory to automatically model and analyze inter-contract relationships, substituting complex manual analysis processes with algorithmic solutions. This automation handles the complexity of tracking numerous contract relationships while providing accurate fraud detection, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250322394A1Methods and systems for forensic investigations in contract networks
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 VM INNOVATIONS I LLC
  • US20250322394A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322394A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322394A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for generating risk assessment scores for blockchain addresses and smart contracts, including constructing a graph representation having nodes representing one of a blockchain address or a smart contract address on a blockchain and edges representing a transaction between an externally-owned blockchain account on the blockchain network and a smart contract address on the blockchain network, applying pattern recognition algorithms to the graph representation to identify sub-graphs having nodes indicating relationship structures indicative of potential fraudulent activity, executing filtering that analyze transaction flows, logic patterns, and behavioral characteristics of nodes within each sub-graph, and determining a risk score for each blockchain account address and smart contract address associated with each sub-graph.