Smart Contract Sensor-Triggered Compliance Enforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current blockchain-based systems lack efficient mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing smart contracts, particularly in scenarios where physical conditions or events need to trigger contract actions, leading to uncertainty and increased transaction costs due to manual monitoring and compliance verification.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that automatically generates and embeds smart contract clauses in a blockchain, invoking them in response to sensor-generated signals corresponding to predefined contract variance conditions, thereby enabling automatic enforcement and recording of contract actions within the immutable blockchain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual monitoring and compliance verification are used for smart contracts, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but transaction costs increase and execution efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction execution efficiencyVSAvoidmonitoring and enforcement mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The smart contract system performs self-monitoring and self-enforcement through automated sensor signal verification. The contract automatically detects sensor signals, compares them against predefined conditions, and executes actions without requiring external manual monitoring, thereby eliminating the need for complex monitoring mechanisms while improving execution efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-defines contract variance conditions and corresponding sensor signal patterns before contract execution. By establishing these conditions in advance and programming the automated response logic, the system eliminates the need for complex real-time monitoring during execution, as the enforcement mechanism is already configured to automatically respond to specific sensor signals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automated sensor-based invocation is implemented, then compliance monitoring efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance monitoring efficiencyVSAvoidsmart contract system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The smart contract system integrates multiple functions into a single automated mechanism: it monitors sensor signals, verifies compliance conditions, determines contract variance, and executes enforcement actions all within one unified system. This multi-functionality improves compliance monitoring efficiency without proportionally increasing system complexity, as a single automated system performs what would otherwise require multiple separate manual processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If manual compliance verification is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but transaction costs increase due to repeated verification needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction costVSAvoidcontract enforcement automation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The smart contract automatically verifies compliance by detecting sensor signals and comparing them against predefined conditions without requiring external verification. This self-verification mechanism eliminates the need for repeated manual compliance checks, significantly reducing transaction costs associated with compliance verification while increasing the level of automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor signals and provides immediate feedback by automatically determining whether contract variance conditions are met and executing corresponding actions. This real-time feedback mechanism replaces costly repeated manual verifications with an automated continuous monitoring system that reduces overall transaction costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11645708B2Smart contract compliance monitoring and enforcement
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11645708B2 patent drawing
  • US11645708B2 patent drawing
  • US11645708B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A smart contract clause can be generated with a processor communicatively coupled to a blockchain supported by a peer-to-peer network. The smart contract clause can be automatically invoked in response to a sensor-generated signal, wherein the sensor-generated signal corresponds to at least one or more predefined contract variance conditions. The smart contract clause can be embedded in a smart contract in the blockchain.