Smart Contract Analytics Platform for Private Solution Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating data science and machine learning solutions require extensive manual negotiations and lack effective contractual frameworks for assessing solution providers without revealing sensitive data or ensuring payment, leading to inefficiencies and trust issues.

Innovation Solution

A digital platform utilizing smart contracts enables data upload and solution provision while preserving privacy, allowing evaluation and performance-based payments, with a centralized or decentralized approach, and leveraging a distributed ledger for secure and transparent interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a centralized platform is used to evaluate data science solutions, then solution quality can be assessed, but the customer must reveal sensitive data and algorithms to the platform provider

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution quality assessmentVSAvoidsensitive data revelation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation process is segmented into multiple independent components: challenge definition, solution submission, automated evaluation, and result verification. Each component operates independently, allowing quality assessment without requiring the platform to access or store sensitive data and algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An automated evaluation system acts as an intermediary between the customer and solution providers. This intermediary objectively assesses solution quality based on predefined criteria without requiring direct access to sensitive proprietary information, thus maintaining privacy while ensuring quality measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual contract negotiations are used for evaluating solution providers, then payment terms can be customized, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment term customizationVSAvoidnegotiation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Payment terms and evaluation criteria are predetermined and encoded in smart contracts before the evaluation process begins. This preliminary setup allows for customized terms to be established once, after which the automated system executes them without requiring time-consuming negotiations for each individual case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual contract negotiation and execution is replaced with automated smart contract technology. The mechanical process of human negotiation is substituted with algorithmic execution of predefined terms, maintaining adaptability through programmable conditions while dramatically reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If trust-based agreements are used with solution providers, then payment can be simplified, but the system requires high trust levels that are not always present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment simplicityVSAvoidtrust level requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service evaluation and payment through automated processes. Solution providers submit their work, the system automatically evaluates it against predefined criteria, and payments are executed automatically. This eliminates the need for trust-based manual processes while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

An automated feedback loop is implemented where the evaluation system objectively assesses solution quality and provides verifiable results. This feedback mechanism replaces subjective trust with objective, transparent evaluation data, allowing simplified payment processes without requiring high trust levels between parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If decentralized approaches are used for the platform, then trust requirements are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrust requirement reductionVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The platform is designed with universal components that can operate in both centralized and decentralized configurations. The same core evaluation logic and smart contract mechanisms function regardless of the deployment architecture, allowing trust reduction benefits without proportionally increasing complexity through standardized multi-functional design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12483385B2Verifiable analytics platform with smart contracts
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US12483385B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for offering data with objects to be performed on the basis of the data, providing solutions to the problems and verifying the provided solutions. The method including the steps of providing a digital platform; uploading the data with the object as challenge to the platform; uploading a smart contract relating to the challenge to the platform; transferring the challenge from the platform to at least one solution provider; uploading a signed hash of the solution provider's solution of the challenge to the platform; uploading the solution provider's solution of the challenge to the platform; and evaluating at the platform the uploaded solution based on predefined conditions.