Smart Data Loader Dynamic Agent Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional data migration systems are inefficient as they do not optimize resource utilization during data migration between databases, leading to underutilization or overutilization of resources.

Innovation Solution

A smart and optimized data loader system that deploys and manages software agent workers based on monitored resource utilization, adding agents when utilization is below a threshold and removing them when it exceeds a threshold to maintain optimal resource usage between 70% and 80%.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional data migration systems are used without resource optimization, then data migration can be performed, but database resources are either underutilized or overutilized leading to inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata migration efficiencyVSAvoiddatabase resource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of software agent workers based on real-time resource utilization monitoring. When resource utilization falls below the desired range (70-80%), additional workers are deployed to increase migration throughput. When utilization exceeds the desired range, workers are removed to prevent overload. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by making the migration system adaptive to current database conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where resource utilization is monitored during data migration and this information feeds back to control the number of software agent workers. The feedback mechanism compares actual utilization against the desired range and triggers appropriate responses (adding or removing workers) to maintain optimal efficiency, thereby resolving the underutilization/overutilization problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If more software agent workers are deployed to increase data migration speed, then productivity improves, but resource utilization may exceed desired levels causing system overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata migration speedVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic worker deployment where the number of software agent workers is not fixed but adjusts in real-time based on resource utilization conditions. This dynamic approach allows the system to scale productivity up when resources are available while maintaining stability by scaling down when utilization exceeds thresholds, thus resolving the contradiction between speed and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of worker count based on monitored resource utilization conditions. By adjusting this key parameter dynamically, the system can optimize migration speed when conditions permit while preventing system overload when resources are constrained, thereby maintaining both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If fewer software agent workers are used to maintain resource utilization, then system stability is maintained, but data migration productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization stabilityVSAvoiddata migration throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than using a fixed low worker count to ensure stability, the system dynamically adjusts worker numbers based on real-time conditions. This allows the system to maintain stability through controlled utilization while capturing productivity opportunities when resources are available, resolving the contradiction between stability and throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts the worker count parameter dynamically based on resource utilization feedback. This parameter change strategy allows the system to optimize for stability when utilization is high while maximizing throughput when resources are underutilized, thereby resolving the trade-off between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If fixed deployment of software agents is used, then system complexity is reduced, but resource utilization cannot be optimized leading to inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagent management complexityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where software agents automatically monitor resource utilization and adjust their own deployment numbers based on predefined conditions. This self-managing approach minimizes manual intervention and system complexity while achieving optimal resource utilization, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters (worker count) based on monitored conditions rather than using fixed deployment. This parameter adaptation enables optimized resource utilization without requiring complex manual management, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and efficiency through automated adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12131193B1Smart and optimized data loader
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 INTUIT INC
  • US12131193B1 patent drawing
  • US12131193B1 patent drawing
  • US12131193B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling software agent workers for migrating data between databases. The method monitors resource utilization of at least one of the databases during the migration of the data and compares the monitored resource utilization to a desired resource utilization range. When the comparison indicates that the monitored resource utilization is less than the desired resource utilization range, the method additively deploys additional software agent workers. When the comparison indicates that the monitored resource utilization is greater than the desired resource utilization range, the method multiplicatively removes software agent workers.