Smart Device Access Control via IP Camera Video Streaming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional building security systems rely heavily on voice verification and statically located access granting boxes, lacking versatility and flexibility in verification methods and access control locations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilizes a smart device connected via the Internet to an IP camera at an access point, allowing end users to verify and communicate with guests remotely, with the option to unlock access points, and includes credentialing and application synchronization for secure access control across multiple access points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional voice verification and static access granting boxes are used, then the security system is simple to implement, but the verification methods lack versatility and the access control locations are fixed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification methodsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The access control system integrates multiple verification methods including voice verification, video verification via IP cameras, and mobile device verification. The system can handle different types of access requests (guest access, employee access, emergency access) through a unified platform that supports various verification modalities, making the system versatile across different access scenarios without requiring separate dedicated systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static access granting boxes to dynamic access control where the granting capability follows the user through mobile devices. The access points can be dynamically activated or deactivated based on real-time verification outcomes, and the system can adapt to different locations and access scenarios without requiring physical reconfiguration of access granting hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If static access granting boxes are used, then the system structure is simple, but the access control cannot be relocated or adapted to different locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control locationsVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The access granting functionality is extracted from fixed physical boxes and transferred to mobile devices and centralized control systems. This allows the access control capability to be relocated anywhere in the building without installing new hardware at each location. The IP cameras and mobile devices serve as portable access granting points, enabling flexible deployment across multiple locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A single centralized access control system manages multiple access points throughout the building, replacing the need for separate static access granting boxes at each location. The system can grant or deny access at any registered access point from a centralized location or through mobile devices, making the access control infrastructure universally applicable across all entry points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If only voice verification is used, then the verification process is quick, but the security verification is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification reliabilityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a tiered verification approach where the level of verification performed depends on the access scenario and risk assessment. For low-risk situations, quick voice verification may suffice. For higher-risk scenarios, the system automatically or manually triggers additional verification steps such as video verification or mobile device authentication. This partial action approach ensures adequate security without always performing the full verification sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where verification outcomes from one method inform the selection of subsequent verification methods. If voice verification is successful but the system detects unusual patterns or the access request is for a sensitive area, the system can trigger additional verification steps. The feedback loop allows the system to adapt the verification process in real-time, balancing security requirements with time efficiency based on the specific context of each access request.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230137281A1Method and system of controlling access to access points
Publication Date: 2023.05.04 MY DOOR VIEW LLC
  • US20230137281A1 patent drawing
  • US20230137281A1 patent drawing
  • US20230137281A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for controlling access to access points of an establishments are described. A call may be initiated from an access box to a smart device thereby activating the smart device to stream video via the Internet from an IP camera located at the access point. An end user of the smart device may communicate with and control access to the access point using the smart device.