Smart Device Conversation Scanning for Real-Time Scam Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity measures fail to effectively prevent fraud on smart devices, particularly mobile devices, by detecting and alerting users to potential scams and fraud in real-time, leading to significant financial losses and data breaches.

Innovation Solution

A software application installed on mobile devices scans conversations, analyzes audio input for scam patterns using machine learning and rule-based decision-making, generates a scam score, and audibly and visually alerts users when a threat is detected, while disabling the microphone to prevent information exposure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing cybersecurity measures are used, then basic security is maintained, but real-time fraud detection and prevention on smart devices is ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention effectivenessVSAvoidsecurity system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security system is segmented into multiple independent components: audio analysis module, text analysis module, device data collection module, scam score calculation module, and alert generation module. Each component performs a specific function and can operate independently, allowing the system to achieve comprehensive fraud detection without requiring a monolithic complex architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting device data (contact list, recent calls, mutual connections) and analyzing communication patterns before fraud occurs. The scam score is calculated in advance based on multiple factors, and alerts are prepared beforehand, enabling the system to prevent fraud before the user suffers financial loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If real-time audio and text analysis is performed, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescam detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by not analyzing every single communication equally. Instead, it focuses analysis on communications that exhibit suspicious patterns or meet certain criteria, calculating scam scores selectively based on risk indicators. This approach maintains high detection accuracy while avoiding the computational overhead of analyzing all communications in detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary elements such as pre-defined scam patterns, rule-based filters, and weighted scoring mechanisms that mediate between raw audio/text data and final fraud detection results. These intermediaries process and simplify the data stream, enabling faster processing while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple device data points are collected and analyzed, then false positives are reduced, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive rateVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by collecting and analyzing multiple varying data points (contact list information, recent call history, mutual connections, communication patterns) rather than relying on a single static parameter. The scam score dynamically adjusts based on the combination of these parameters, reducing false positives through multi-factor analysis while using a standardized scoring framework to manage complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If audio output alerts are used to warn users, then user awareness of threats is improved, but the system may cause user alarm or disruption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser awarenessVSAvoiduser alarm
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The alert system applies local quality by providing targeted warnings only to specific users who are currently engaged in suspicious communications, rather than issuing blanket alerts to all users. The alert content is customized based on the specific threat detected, and the volume/intensity can be adjusted locally for each user context, reducing unnecessary alarm while maintaining effective warning for genuine threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12413616B2Preventing fraud on smart devices
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 KYNDRYL INC
  • US12413616B2 patent drawing
  • US12413616B2 patent drawing
  • US12413616B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments relate to preventing fraud on smart devices. In response to receiving a communication, a correlation of the communication to a security threat is determined, and device data of a device is obtained. A determination is made that a combination of the correlation and the device data meets a predefined threshold for the security threat. An alert is audibly output on the device, the audio alert being a warning of the security threat presented by the communication.