Smart Firearm Wireless Authentication and Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional firearm safety mechanisms do not adequately address the need for advanced systems to prevent unauthorized use and ensure safe handling of firearms, particularly in scenarios where distance from authorized users or battery status is concerned.

Innovation Solution

A smart firearm system incorporating processors, memory, and electronic tags that transmit and receive wireless signals to determine distance from authorized users and manage locking mechanisms based on battery status, enabling or disabling the firearm's firing mechanism accordingly, and utilizing voice commands for control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wireless signal transmission and distance monitoring are implemented, then firearm safety through authorized user verification is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirearm safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The remote device serves multiple functions: it acts as both a wireless communication device and a distance monitoring system, while also functioning as an alarm device. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each safety function, thereby improving reliability without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The wireless signal acts as an intermediary between the firearm and the authorized user's remote device. Instead of requiring direct physical contact or complex mechanical authentication, the system uses wireless communication as a mediator to verify user presence and authorization, simplifying the overall authentication mechanism while maintaining high safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If distance-based authentication using wireless signal strength is implemented, then unauthorized use prevention is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunauthorized use preventionVSAvoiddistance measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors wireless signal strength and uses this feedback to determine whether the authorized user is within the required proximity. The signal strength measurements are continuously updated and compared against threshold values, allowing the system to dynamically adjust its safety state based on real-time conditions rather than relying on single-point measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring extremely precise distance measurements, the system changes the parameter being measured from absolute distance to relative signal strength. This approach uses the wireless signal's inherent properties (strength variations with distance) to create a practical authentication mechanism that is sufficiently accurate for safety purposes without demanding ultra-precise measurement capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If battery monitoring and forced enable/disable modes are implemented, then firearm safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirearm safetyVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary battery status checks and proactively transitions to forced enable or disable modes before complete battery depletion occurs. By monitoring battery levels and taking preventive action in advance, the system ensures safety without requiring complex real-time intervention mechanisms, as the forced modes are pre-programmed responses to specific battery conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11060812B2Smart firearm
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 SAFEARMS LLC
  • US11060812B2 patent drawing
  • US11060812B2 patent drawing
  • US11060812B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for controlling a firearm. Components embedded in a portion of the firearm enable the firearm to determine if a user of the firearm is authorized to do so, and either enable or disable a firing mechanism of the firearm accordingly. The firearm may also send communication signals regarding the status of the firearm or events detected by the firearm to a remote device controlled by an authorized user. The system may thereby notify the authorized user of attempted unauthorized use of the firearm, that the firearm has been left behind by the authorized user, or that the firearm is being tampered with. The system may also include multi-tag or a voice-override features that prevent the firearm from being used against the authorized user should the authorized user lose control of the firearm.