Smart Grouping Legend for Drilling Analysis Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drilling operation modeling and analysis software can only handle a single analysis at a time, discarding previous results and making it difficult for users to compare changes in operational parameters across multiple analyses.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that allows users to run and retain multiple models and analyses within a given session, using a flexible database structure to store operational parameters and provide a graphical interface for easy comparison of results across different drilling depth or time ranges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the software allows multiple analyses to be run simultaneously, then the ability to compare operational parameters across different analyses is improved, but the system complexity and data management requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to run multiple analysesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The software divides the analysis management system into separate modules: a database layer for storing multiple analysis instances, a processing layer for executing individual analyses, and a presentation layer for displaying and comparing results. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple analyses independently while maintaining organized data structures and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and stores copies of analysis results and operational parameters in a structured database format. Each analysis instance is preserved as a discrete record, allowing users to retrieve, compare, and re-analyze previous results without re-running the entire analysis process, thus managing complexity through efficient data replication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If the software retains previous analysis results for comparison, then the ease of operation is improved, but the memory and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of comparing resultsVSAvoiddata storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential operational parameters and key results from each analysis instance for storage and comparison, rather than retaining all raw data and intermediate calculation steps. This selective extraction maintains the ability to compare analyses while minimizing storage requirements by keeping only the most relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The software transforms detailed analysis results into condensed parameter summaries that capture the essential differences between analyses. By changing the representation from comprehensive raw data to standardized parameter sets, the system enables efficient storage and rapid comparison while preserving the ability to retrieve detailed information when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If the software requires re-entry of operational parameters for each analysis, then the processing speed is improved, but the productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis processing speedVSAvoiduser efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary storage of operational parameters and analysis configurations in a structured database during the first analysis. This preliminary action creates a reusable template that can be automatically loaded for subsequent analyses, eliminating the need for users to re-enter parameters and significantly improving productivity while maintaining fast processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The software implements a feedback mechanism where previous analysis results and parameter settings are automatically retrieved and presented as starting points for new analyses. Users can review and modify these pre-loaded parameters before running new analyses, reducing repetitive data entry while maintaining the ability to adjust parameters as needed for each specific analysis case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10662757B2Smart grouping legend
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP
  • US10662757B2 patent drawing
  • US10662757B2 patent drawing
  • US10662757B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A smart legend groups plot lines that reflect the same type of drill string analysis. The smart legend includes parent level legend entries, each parent level legend entry including child level legend entries. The child level legend entries for a given parent level legend entry correspond to plot lines that reflect a particular type of drill string analysis. Each child level legend entry corresponds to a plot line that reflects the particular drill string analysis performed over a different depth range. This allows users easily to view and compare the analyses at the different drilling depth ranges.