Smart Home Security Mesh Network Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current smart home systems lack integrated, multi-sensing, network-connected devices that can seamlessly communicate and coordinate to provide comprehensive home security and automation features, leading to inefficiencies and vulnerabilities in security and control.

Innovation Solution

The development of intelligent, multi-sensing, network-connected devices that communicate with each other and a central server or cloud-computing system to provide home security and automation objectives, including thermostats, hazard detectors, doorbells, wall switches, and entry detectors, forming a mesh network for enhanced security and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional separate security systems and control systems are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but system integration and coordination capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integrationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges security systems, control systems, and communication infrastructure into a single integrated smart home system. The control panel consolidates multiple functions including security monitoring, environmental control, communication interfaces, and system management into one unified device, eliminating the need for separate standalone systems while maintaining all required capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control panel is designed as a universal device that performs multiple functions: it monitors security sensors, controls environmental devices, communicates with external systems, manages user interfaces, and coordinates system-wide operations. This multi-functional design allows a single device to replace what would traditionally require multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Extent of automation

If manual control and monitoring methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but automation capability and response speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring security rules, environmental settings, and response protocols before incidents occur. The control panel continuously monitors sensor data and automatically executes pre-programmed responses to security events, environmental conditions, and user commands, eliminating the need for manual intervention in routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control panel implements continuous feedback loops that monitor system state, sensor readings, and environmental conditions in real-time. Based on this feedback, the system automatically adjusts security settings, environmental controls, and communication protocols without human intervention, enabling dynamic adaptation to changing conditions while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If centralized control architecture is implemented, then system coordination is improved, but vulnerability to single point of failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control panel is segmented into multiple independent functional modules including security monitoring, environmental control, communication management, and user interface handling. Each module operates independently and can function autonomously, reducing the impact of failures in any single module while maintaining overall system coordination through standardized communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates redundancy mechanisms and fault tolerance designs that prepare for potential failures before they occur. The control panel includes backup communication paths, redundant sensor readings, and error correction protocols that prevent single points of failure from compromising system reliability, cushioning against the risks inherent in centralized architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS10735216B2Handling security services visitor at a smart-home
Publication Date: 2020.08.04 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10735216B2 patent drawing
  • US10735216B2 patent drawing
  • US10735216B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This patent specification relates to apparatus, systems, methods, and related computer program products for providing home security/smart home objectives. More particularly, this patent specification relates to a plurality of devices, including intelligent, multi-sensing, network-connected devices, that communicate with each other and/or with a central server or a cloud-computing system to provide any of a variety of useful home security/smart home objectives.