Smart Home Twin-Control Architecture for Reliable Linkage Actions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing smart home control systems face challenges in ensuring high success rates and reliability of linkage actions due to reliance on a single control path, which can fail if the local network apparatus or remote device fails, and lack flexibility in adapting to changes in device connectivity and capabilities.

Innovation Solution

Implement a 'twin-control' mechanism using a first endpoint (e.g., a gateway) and a second endpoint (e.g., a cloud server) to generate and send parallel commands to a responding device, with each endpoint maintaining a subset of rules and generating commands based on trigger events, ensuring redundancy and adaptability to device connectivity changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single control path is used in smart home systems, then the system structure is simple, but the reliability of linkage actions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuccess rate of linkage actionsVSAvoidcontrol path structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent control paths: a first control path through a local gateway and a second control path through a remote device. Each path can independently generate and execute commands, ensuring that failure in one path does not compromise the entire system's reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements redundant control paths in advance to cushion against potential failures. By pre-establishing both local and remote control paths, the system ensures that if one path fails, the other can compensate, thereby maintaining reliable operation of linkage actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If parallel command generation from multiple endpoints is implemented, then the reliability of control is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol reliabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides control functionality into separate segments: local gateway operations and remote device operations. Each endpoint maintains its own rule set and command generation logic, allowing parallel operation without requiring complex integrated control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Both the gateway and remote device are designed with universal command generation capabilities. Each endpoint can independently generate commands for the same responding devices, allowing either endpoint to function as the primary controller depending on connectivity conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple endpoints maintain rule sets, then the adaptability to connectivity changes is improved, but the information management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to connectivity changesVSAvoidrule synchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where endpoints communicate their operational status and connectivity state to each other. This allows dynamic adjustment of command generation responsibilities, ensuring that the active endpoint always has the necessary rule information to maintain adaptability to connectivity changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Rule sets are pre-configured and maintained at both endpoints before connectivity issues arise. This preliminary preparation ensures that when connectivity changes occur, each endpoint can immediately utilize its pre-stored rules without requiring real-time information exchange, thus maintaining adaptability while minimizing information management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4712415A1Device operating in smart home system, smart home system and corresponding method
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 TP-LINK SYSTEMS INC
  • EP4712415A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4712415A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4712415A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides a device operating in smart home system, a smart home system, corresponding method and computer program product. The smart home system may include a first endpoint, a second endpoint, a plurality of trigger devices and a plurality of responding devices. Each trigger device is configured to generate one or more trigger events; and send them to the first endpoint and the second endpoint. The first endpoint is configured to generate a set of first endpoint commands and send them to a responding device among the plurality of responding devices. The second endpoint is configured to generate a set of second endpoint commands and send them to the responding device. The responding device is configured to perform a set of actions based on the set of first endpoint commands and the set of second endpoint commands.